<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">

Polar 4.2 For Windows

Electrochemical simulation and data analysis

 

DrHuang Pty Ltd

124 Eastern Avenue, Kingsford, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia

Phone: (61 2) 9662 0516

mailto:info@electroanal.com
info@DrHuang.com

www.electrochem.net

http://www.drhuang.com/

http://www.electroanal.com/

Copyright @ 1990-2000

October 14, 2000


 

Contents

 

Chapter 1 Introduction. 3

Chapter 2 Polarography and Voltammetry. 3

Chapter 3 Features. 11

Chapter 4 Menu. 14

Chapter 5 Input 16

5.1 Techniques window.. 16

5.2 Mechanism window.. 16

5.3 Instrument Window.. 16

5.4 Chemicals Window.. 17

Chapter 6 Playing Around. 18

6.1 Running Simulation. 18

6.1.1 Effect of Electron Number 18

6.1.2 Effect of Electrode Geometry. 18

6.2 Comparing Curves. 19

6.3 Analyzing Data. 19

6.4 Calculating Theoretical Limiting Current 19

6.5 Extracting Parameters by Curve Fitting. 19

6.5.1 Fitting to Simulation Curve. 19

6.5.2 Fitting to Experimental Curve. 19

6.6 Stripping Voltammetry. 19

Chapter 7  Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 20

Chapter 8  References. 22

 


 

<big>Chapter 1
Introduction
</big>   

Polar (an abbreviation for Polarography) is a general electrochemical simulator. It analytically and digitally simulates voltammograms (polarograms) on virtually any mechanism at 9 electrode geometries (planar, spherical, semi-spherical, cylindrical, semi-cylindrical, microdisc, thin film, and rotating electrodes) in over 5 techniques (linear sweep and CV, DC, normal pulse, differential pulse, and square wave voltammetries). It also simulates effects of charge current, resistance, noise, electrolyte, stripping time, stripping potential, convection, etc. User can type in his mechanism with any symbol.

It analyses any ASCII x-y data for detecting peak location, peak value, semi-derivative, derivative, integral, semi-integral, curve fitting, and separating overlapped peaks.

It shows tip when the user put mouse cursor over a label. The program can separate overlapped voltammograms into individuals, and extract real peak from voltammogram with noise and baseline. It outputs the theoretical peak values, the peak current and potential and current-potential data, which can be imported into other program (e.g. Lotus 123). User can copy-and-paste the voltammogram into his document.

 

It has been successfully applied to fit experimental polarograms (voltammograms) of In(III), Cd(II), Pb(II), Tl(I), Cr(III), Zn(II), and binuclear copper complex in aqueous and non-aqueous media at mercury, solid metal and non-metal electrodes (specifically the dropping mercury, hanging mercury drop, gold, platinum and glassy carbon electrodes) by various electrochemical techniques (differential pulse, square wave, and pseudo-derivative normal pulse polarographies) [1-5].

 

It is available from the author or my Web site. If you have any question, please read FAQ in its document. For tutorial, please read the course practices in the rmit.htm file.

It is assumed that you agree the Shareware license that you should register by US$20 with author in 20 days or you should delete it.

 

<big>Chapter 2

Polarography and Voltammetry
</big>   

2.1             Introduction   

                  Modern electrochemical methods offer the analytical chemist a wide variety of techniques to solve analytical problems. Voltammetry is one such method, in which the current is measured as a function of applied potential. Polarography is another method, which differs from voltammetry in that it employs a dropping mercury electrode (DME) to continuously renew the electrode surface.

                  In this chapter, the fundamental principles of direct current polarography (DCP), alternating current polarography (ACP), square wave polarography (SWP), normal pulse polarography (NPP), differential pulse polarography (DPP), and pseudo-derivative normal pulse polarography (PDNPP) are reviewed. Much of this theory is also applicable to voltammetry. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and stripping voltammetry (SV) are also described. If you are familiar with polarography and voltammetry, they can move directly to the next chapter.  

                  Beside techniques, theoretical equations also depend on mechanism, reversibility, and electrode geometry. You can calculate the limiting current from the below equations by clicking the Theoretical Peak submenu.

 

2.2             Direct Current Polarography

 

                  Heyrovsky invented the original polarographic method, conventional direct current polarography (DCP), and Heyrovsky and Shikata constructed the first polarograph in 1925 [6]. DCP involves the measurement of current flowing through the dropping mercury electrode (DME) as a function of applied potential. Under the influence of gravity, mercury drops grow from the end of a fine glass capillary until they detach. Then the process is allowed to repeat itself. Drops may be allowed to fall naturally or may be dislodged after a specified interval with the aid of a mechanical device. A major advantage of the DME is that a constantly renewed electrode surface is exposed to the test solution so that problems of electrode blockage are avoided. Another advantage of the DME is that it allows a number of electrode reduction processes to be monitored, which would otherwise be inaccessible, because a wide negative potential region is available on account of the high overpotential for water reduction.

                  If an electroactive species is capable of undergoing a redox process at the DME, then an S-shaped current-potential relation is usually observed. This is called a polarographic wave. Figure 1.1 illustrates the response obtained from a reduction reaction where the current (i) increases over a particular potential (E) range until it reaches a limiting value. The limiting current is the diffusion-controlled limiting current (id). This id is of interest in analytical measurements as it is proportional to the concentration of reactant. Ilkovic [4] first put the measurement of this current on a theoretical basis, and his equation is [4-6]

id = (7/3)1/2 (36 p)1/6 r2/3 nF D1/2 m2/3 td1/6 C                                                                       (2.1)

where r is the density of mercury, n is the number of electrons, F is Faraday's  constant, D is the diffusion coefficient, m is the flow rate of mercury, td is the drop time, and C is the concentration of the electroactive species in the bulk solution.

 


 

 

                  For a planar electrode,

id = nFAD1/2  C / (p td ) 1/2                                                                                          (2.2)

                  For a spherical electrode with radius r,

id = id(planar)+nFADC / r = nFAD1/2 C (1/ (p td ) 1/2 + D1/2 / r )                               (2.3)

                  For a microelectrode, a steady-state current is

id = GnFA1/2 DC                                                                                                        (2.4)

where G is an electrode geometry constant, only depending on electrode geometry.

                  For a microdisc electrode, G=4/(p) ½

id =4/(p) ½ nFA1/2 DC = 4nFDC r

                  For a microsphere electrode, G=2p ½

id = 2p ½ nFA1/2 DC = 4pnFDC r

 

                  The half-wave potential E1/2 is another important parameter of the DC polarogram. This is the potential at which the current reaches half of its limiting value (Figure 1.1). The value of half-wave potential is usually independent of concentration and is characteristic of the electroactive species. Therefore it can be used for qualitative characterization of the species, and is the foundation of qualitative analysis.

                  The shape of the DC polarogram is also very important to the overall characterization of the electrode process. If the reduction reaction is reversible and controlled by diffusion, the potential (E) is related to the concentrations of reactant and product by the Nernst equation [7]:

E = E° + (RT/nF) ln( CO(0)/CR(0) )                                                                            (2.5)

where E° is the standard redox potential, R is a gas constant, T is temperature, CO(0) and CR(0) are the surface concentrations of species Ox and Red, respectively. The shape of the DC polarographic wave is then derived by combining the Nernst and Ilkovic equations as follows [8, 9] 

E = E1/2 + (RT/nF) ln( (id - i)/i )

or

i = id / [1 + exp( (nF/RT) (E - E1/2))]                                                                           (2.6)

where

E1/2 = E° + (RT/2nF) ln( DR/DO )                                                                                 (2.7)

                  Since the diffusion coefficients of oxidized and reduced forms, DO and DR, are often almost equal, then E1/2 = E°. When i = id /2, then E = E1/2.

                  Equation (2.6) is the Heyrovsky-Ilkovic equation, and is often used in investigations into the nature of electrode processes. However, an experimental DC polarogram also shows the oscillatory behavior of the current due to the growth and fall of the mercury drop, and this is superimposed on the DC behaviour. This invariably causes problems in the measurement of wave heights and/or half-wave potentials, and of course has deleterious effects on measures of analytical performance, especially sensitivity and resolution. Despite these problems, the DME remains popular because of its constantly renewed surface.

 

2.3 Linear Sweep Voltammetry and Cyclic Voltammetry

 

                  Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) is performed by applying a linear potential ramp in the same manner as DCP. However, with LSV the potential scan rate is usually much faster than with DCP. When the reduction potential of the analyte is approached, the current begins to flow. The current increases in response to the increasing potential. However, as the reduction proceeds, a diffusion layer is formed and the rate of the electrode reduction becomes diffusion limited. At this point the current slowly declines. The result is the asymmetric peak-shaped I-E curve, as in Figure 1.3.

 

 

 

 

For a reversible reaction, the peak current is

Ip = 0.4463 nFAC (nFvD/(RT))1/2                                                                                (2.8)

The peak potential is

Ep = E1/2 – 1.109 RT/(nF)                                                                                             (2.9)

The half-peak potential is

Ep/2 = E1/2 + 1.09 RT/(nF)                                                                                             (2.10)

The difference between peak potential and half-peak potential, similar to the half-peak width, is

| Ep - Ep/2 | = 2.2 RT/(nF) = 56.5/n  (mV) at 25 °C                                                       (2.11)

            Cyclic voltammetry is similar to linear sweep voltammetry except for the potential scans from the starting potential to the end potential, then reverse from the end potential back to the starting potential. The difference between two peak potentials is

 DEp =| Epa - Epc | = 2.3 RT/(nF) = 58/n  (mV) at 25 °C                                               (2.12)

For a non-reversible reaction, DEp becomes larger.

 

2.4             Alternating Current Polarography 

 

                  A number of modifications to DCP have improved its analytical performance. One of them is alternating current polarography (ACP). ACP is the result of superimposing a small amplitude sinusoidal potential (DE) with a fixed frequency (w) on a slowly scanning DC ramp, as (c) in Figure 1.2. The applied potential is then given by summing the AC and DC components. Finally, the alternating current (AC) is measured as a function of DC potential. In particular, the amplitude of the AC current vs. the DC potential is plotted, as (g) in Figure 1.2. The current-potential (I-E) curve for a reversible reaction follows the equation [6]

I = n2F2 AC DE (wD)1/2 sech2 [(nF/2RT)(E - E1/2)] /(4RT)                           (2.13)

At a peak, sech()=1, then the above equation reduces to

Ip = n2F2 AC DE (wD)1/2/(4RT)                                                                                 (2.14)

                  It may be deduced from this equation that the amplitude of the AC component of the Faradic current (I) is peak-shaped. Moreover, the peak current is a linear function of concentration and therefore may be used in analytical applications. Like the half-wave potential E1/2 in DCP, the peak potential Ep in ACP is characteristic of the electroactive species. Also, the half-peak width (i.e. the width of the peak at half its height, W1/2) is [6] 

W1/2 = 3.52 RT/(nF) = 90/n mV at 25 °C.                                                                 (2.15)

 

 

2.5             Square Wave Polarography

 

                  Square wave polarography (SWP) uses a small amplitude square wave voltage in place of the sinusoidal one used in ACP. Its potential waveform is shown in (d) of Figure 1.2. The current is sampled near the end of each square wave half cycle, to minimize double-layer charging effects, and the I-E response is obtained by plotting the differences in current between successive half cycles. For reversible electrode processes, the I-E curve for SWP is similar to that in ACP [6], so its properties, including the half-peak width W1/2 and resolution, are obviously akin to ACP.

 

2.6             Normal Pulse Polarography

                  The pulse polarographies including normal pulse polarography (NPP) and differential pulse polarography (DPP) stem from Barker's original work on square wave polarography [6]. The increased sensitivity of these techniques over DCP arises from their ability to discriminate against the charging current by measuring the total current after the charging current has decayed to values substantially less than the Faradic current.

                  The potential-time waveform used in NPP is presented as (a) in Figure 1.2. At the beginning of the potential sweep, the electrode is held at an initial potential where no Faradic current flows.  Potential pulses of increasing amplitude are then applied to the electrode at regular intervals. The potential pulses are about 50 ms in duration and the current is measured at a time near the end of each pulse. A potential pulse is ended by a return to the initial potential and the drop is dislodged. The whole process is repeated except a few millivolts are added to the potential pulse in next cycle. A normal pulse polarogram is shown as (e) of Figure 1.2.  The shape of the normal pulse polarogram is sigmoidal, looking similar to the shape of a DC polarogram, and indeed it can be described by a current-potential equation similar to that in DCP [6].

                  For a planar electrode,

id = nFAD1/2  C / (p tp ) 1/2                                                                                          (2.16)

                  For a spherical electrode with radius r,

id = id(planar)+nFADC / r = nFAD1/2 C (1/ (p tp ) 1/2 + D1/2 /r )                                (2.17)

 

2.7             Differential Pulse Polarography

 

                  Normal pulse polarography gives improved sensitivity by avoiding most of the charging current by sampling the total current as late as possible after the application of each potential pulse. However, there still is the charging current to some extent. Another defect of NPP is poor resolution between neighbouring wave because of drawn-out sigmoidal I-E response. Differential pulse polarography (DPP) was designed to overcome these problems by arranging a charging current of smaller magnitude, and by producing a peak-shaped I-E curve.

                  The potential-time waveform used in DPP is shown as (b) of Figure 1.2. A voltage ramp is applied to the electrode as in the DCP, and a small amplitude potential pulse (DE) is added to the voltage towards the end of each drop's life. The currents are measured before applying the pulse and at the end of the pulse. When the difference between the two current samples is plotted as a function of the applied ramp voltage, a peak-shaped current response is shown as (f) in Figure 1.2.

                  The peak-shaped I-E curve allows polarographic responses in close proximity to each other to be more clearly resolved than in either DCP or NPP. The I-E curve for all values of the pulse amplitude is described by [6]

I = nFAC (D/ p tp)1/2 P (s2-1)/[(s+P)(1+Ps)]                                                           (2.18)

where

s = exp(nFDE/(2RT))                                                                                                (2.19)

P = exp[(nF/(RT))(E - E1/2 + DE/2)]                                                                           (2.20)

At a peak, P=1, then the current equation reduces to

Ip = nFAC (D/ p tp)1/2 (s -1)/(1+s)                                                                             (2.21)

Ep = E1/2 - DE/2                                                                                                           (2.22)

The half-peak width is a very important parameter in resolution. The half-peak width W1/2 is a function of the pulse amplitude as follows [6]

W1/2 = 2RT/(nF) cosh-1[2 + cosh(nFDE/(2RT))]                                                       (2.23)

For large values of |DE| (say |DE| > 200/n mV), W1/2 approaches to |DE|, and for small values of |DE| (e.g. |DE| < 20/n mV), this equation reduces to equation (2.15).

                  Unfortunately, the above theoretical equations are derived by neglecting the DC effect in DPP, and although this is not a problem when the ratio of the drop time to the pulse time is larger than 50, the resulting distortion makes the theoretical treatment complicated, especially for a non-reversible reaction.

 

2.8             Pseudo-Derivative Normal Pulse Polarography

 

                  DPP is a very sensitive electroanalytical technique due to the effective discrimination against the charging current. However, DPP has two problems associated with the slowly increasing DC ramp. As the DC ramp progresses, filming may occur on the surface of the electrode if species form insoluble mercury compounds [6]. Since the characteristics of the electrode are changed by such a film, the current may not correspond to the simple theory. Another problem is that the theory itself is complicated by the effect of the DC ramp. NPP avoids these two problems. But the disadvantage of NPP is its poor resolution because of the sigmoidal wave. To overcome this shortcoming, NPP polarograms can be differentiated to produce peak-shaped responses, and thus combine the best features of both DPP and NPP while avoiding some of their limitations. This pseudo-derivative normal pulse polarography (PDNPP) nevertheless is not sensitive as DPP.

                  The potential-time waveform in PDNPP is as in NPP, but the current data of PDNPP are displayed in a difference mode. The current is subtracted from those for the following pulses, and the difference is plotted as a function of potential, as in DPP.

                  The theoretical treatment of PDNPP is simple and easy. The reversible current-potential equation is similar to that of DPP except for the DC term [6]. The half-peak width or resolution is akin to that of DPP.

 

2.9             Stripping Voltammetry

 

                  Stripping voltammetry involves three main steps: deposition (preconcentration), equilibration, and stripping. The first step is to concentrate the analyte from the dilute test solution into or onto the electrode at negative reduction (or positive oxidation) potentials, usually accompanied by stirring. The second step is to leave the solution to settle down. The third step is then to strip the preconcentrated analyte from the electrode back into the solution by using one of the polarographic techniques described above. A major advantage of this method is its extremely sensitivity. This is because the concentration of the analyte on the electrode is 100-1000 times greater than that in the starting solution [6].

 

<big>Chapter 3
Features

This software analytically and digitally simulates voltammograms (polarograms) on virtually any mechanism at 9 electrode geometries in above techniques, calculates their theoretical peak current and potential, retrieve parameters by curve fitting, and separate overlapped peaks and baseline. </big>

·        Digital simulation
Flexible for any mechanism up to second-order chemical reaction. You can type your mechanism and chemical symbols. An implicit finite difference algorithm.

·        Analytical simulation
No divergence problem in simulation. No overflow problem in simulation. Fast simulation.

·        Over 5 techniques
Linear sweep, CV, DC, normal pulse, differential pulse, square wave voltammetries. Multi-cyclic voltammetry, cyclic normal pulse, cyclic differential pulse, cyclic square wave voltammetries.

·        Surface concentration
It shows what happen each species in the electrode surface.

·        Theoretical peak
You can compare your data with theoretical peak values to see if your experimental conditions reach theoretical limit or not.

·        Simulating effect of noise, charge current, resistance, electrolyte, stripping time, stripping potential, convection, etc.

·        Separating overlapped peaks
It manually and auto separates overlapped peaks into individuals, and extract real peak from voltammogram with noise and baseline. So you can exactly determine peaks.

·        Preconcentration
You can change preconcentration conditions for stripping voltammetry.

·        Pre-equilibration

·        Curve fitting
It manually and auto fits the simulated voltammograms into experimental data, and extracts kinetic parameters from experimental data.

·        Import and export data
You can export simulated data into your favor program (e.g. MS Excel). You can copy-n-paste the voltammogram into your document.

·        Derivative, integral, semi-derivative, semi-integral
Semi-derivative is useful for CV. It can change a shape of reversible CV into symmetric peak so easy to determine peak.

·        9 electrode geometries
planar, spherical, semi-spherical, cylindrical, semi-cylindrical, band, microdisk, thin film, and rotating disk electrodes.

·        Tip
It shows tip for help when you put mouse cursor over a label.

 

 

 


Table 1 Feature

Version              

Shareware

Student    

Standard

Full

Competitor

digital simulation

y

y

y

y

y

analytical simulation

y

y

y

y

n

theoretical peak

y

y

y

y

n

multi-electron reaction

y

y

y

y

n

surface concentration

y

y

y