From:	Andy Holder <AHOLDER[ AT ]VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 1992 05:55 CST
Subject:	A gadfly forever.....

From:	rs0thp \\at// rohmhaas.COM (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 92 9:09:04 EST
Subject:	Re: Performance comparisons question

From:	states[ AT ]ncbi.nlm.nih.GOV (David States)
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 92 09:40:36 EST
Subject:	Re: A gadfly forever..... (How far can you push semi-empirical

From:	fredvc $#at#$ esvax.dnet.dupont.com
Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 92 23:17:52 -0500
Subject:	RE: the future of ab initio

From:	case { *at * } scripps.EDU (David Case)
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 92 08:35:06 PST
Subject:	Re: A gadfly forever..... (How far can you push semi-empirical

From:	d3f012(-(at)-)gator.pnl.GOV
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 92 08:35:38 PST
Subject:	large scale semi-empirical calculations

From:	zheng %! at !% retina.chem.psu.EDU (Ya-Jun Zheng)
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 1992 13:25:11 -0500
Subject:	No subject given

From:	"DOUGLAS A. SMITH" <FAX0236 "at@at" uoft02.utoledo.EDU>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 1992 15:26 EST
Subject:	Midwest Theo. Chem. Conference

From:	berkley.,at,.wubs.wustl.EDU (Berkley Shands)
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 92 13:19:59 -0600
Subject:	Recent Benchmarks