From:	parthiban.srinivasan ^at^ astrazeneca.com
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:44:00 +0200
Subject:	CCL: molecular diversity

From:	Victor Lua~na <pueyo { *at * } pinon.ccu.uniovi.es>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:32:04 +0200 (METDST)
Subject:	Re: CCL:Orbital energies for 1st row transition metals.

From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Meike=20Reinhold?= <m.reinhold { *at * } rocketmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:15:30 +0100 (BST)
Subject:	Merz Kollman charges calculated with G98

From:	"Shobe, Dave" <dshobe { *at * } sud-chemieinc.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:47:59 -0400
Subject:	RE: isolobal vs. isoelectronic

From:	Roy Jensen <royj %-% at %-% UVic.CA>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: CCL:isolobal vs. isoelectronic

From:	Vemparala Satyavani <vani %! at !% reef.phys.lsu.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:17:13 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:	TIP$P water model (fwd)

From:	Laurence Lavelle <lavelle # - at - # mbi.ucla.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:53:16 -0700
Subject:	Orbital energies for 1st row transition metals.

From:	"derosa" <derosa %-% at %-% engr.sc.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:38:29 -0400
Subject:	UFF

From:	"Kieran F Lim (Lim Pak Kwan)" <lim # - at - # deakin.edu.au>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:32:21 +1000
Subject:	Re: CCL:isolobal vs. isoelectronic

From:	"Jim Kress" <kresslists<;at;>kressworks.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:02:54 -0400
Subject:	Re: CCL:Universal Force Field (UFF)

From:	Laurence Lavelle <lavelle "at@at" mbi.ucla.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:06:54 -0700
Subject:	Summary: Orbital energies for 1st row transition metals.

From:	Guosheng Wu <gwuxi : at : chem.nwu.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:21:50 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:	Re: CCL:isolobal vs. isoelectronic

From:	"derosa" <derosa (+ at +) engr.sc.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:49:55 -0400
Subject:	Fw: CCL:Universal Force Field (UFF)