CCL Home

Up Directory CCL April 26, 2020

Previous day Month index Next day

From:  Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola^^alumni.helsinki.fi>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:37:59 +0300
Subject:  CCL: which charge partitioning methods always give non-negative atom-in-material densities?

From:  "Stefan Grimme" <grimme(!)thch.uni-bonn.de>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 07:17:24 -0400
Subject:  CCL: which charge partitioning methods always give non-negative atom-in-mat

From:  Tatiana Korona <tania^_^tiger.chem.uw.edu.pl>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject:  CCL: which charge partitioning methods always give non-negative atom-in-material densities?

From:  Sebastian Kozuch <seb.kozuch!^!gmail.com>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:01:46 +0300
Subject:  CCL: which charge partitioning methods always give non-negative atom-in-material densities?

From:  Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola a alumni.helsinki.fi>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:44:44 +0300
Subject:  CCL: which charge partitioning methods always give non-negative atom-in-material densities?

From:  Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola.:.alumni.helsinki.fi>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:47:25 +0300
Subject:  CCL: which charge partitioning methods always give non-negative atom-in-mat

From:  "Pierre Archirel" <pierre.archirel!A!universite-paris-saclay.fr>
Date:  Sun, 26 Apr 2020 03:11:53 -0400
Subject:  CCL: TDDFT for UV-visible spectra