From d3e102 %-% at %-% ames.pnl.gov Thu Apr 22 04:21:20 1993 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 93 11:21:20 -0700 From: d3e102 "-at-" ames.pnl.gov Subject: Benchmark Info. Available To: chemistry[ AT ]ccl.net Message-Id: <9304221821.AA07611&$at$&ames.pnl.gov> Recently, in regard to the availability of Gaussian on high-end PC's, someone mentioned that it would be helpful to have comparative information available on the relative performance on other machines. Here in the MSRC we have just completed a benchmark study of Gaussian 90 and 92, as well as many other popular ab initio packages (GAMESS-US, GAMESS-UK, HONDO, DISCO, MOLPRO and ACES II). We examined their respective performance in terms of CPU time and wall clock time on a variety of machines, including workstations from Sun, HP, IBM and SGI, as well as large machines like a Cray Y-MP and a C90. In an attempt to avoid skewing the results towards one particular type of calculation, we included 5 different molecules (ranging from small, with high symmetry to large with little or no symmetry). Among the methods examined were RHF (conventional and direct), UHF, MP2 (conventional and direct), MP4, gradients and hessians for RHF and MP2, CISD, CCSD, QCISD and CASSCF. A small amount of information was included on the recently introduced DEC Alpha workstations. Lastly, there is a reference to several density functional programs which we have also benchmarked, using some of the same molecules and similar quality Gaussian basis sets. This information is contained in a Pacific Northwest Labs technical report which is slowly winding its way through clearance. We will make it available to anyone requesting it and a PostScript version will be available for downloading via anonymous FTP. The latter has not yet been set up. People will have to judge the cost effectiveness of workstations vs super- computers vs PCs for themselves. However, I can't help but note that the quantity which is of primary interest to most scientists using these programs is the "time-to-solution". Very fast, very expensive computers are nearly always oversubscribed. This results in lengthy waits in long queues for a chance at the limited resources. Our experience has been that it is often possible for the unemcumbered tortoise to beat the overburdened hare. David Feller Molecular Science Research Center d3e102 -A_T- pnlg.pnl.gov