From CHMIGORN /at\NUSVM.NUS.SG  Thu Dec  1 22:16:30 1994
Received: from phem3  for CHMIGORN- at -NUSVM.NUS.SG
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id WAA00512; Thu, 1 Dec 1994 22:00:16 -0500
Received: from NUSVM.NUS.SG (MAILER #at# NUSVM) by phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu (PMDF
 V4.2-13 #5888) id <01HK57THRREO94EFR9 /at\phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>; Thu,
 1 Dec 1994 22:00:10 EDT
Received: from NUSVM.NUS.SG (NJE origin CHMIGORN#* at *#NUSVM) by NUSVM.NUS.SG (LMail
 V1.2a/1.8a) with RFC822 id 6033; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:17:50 +0800
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 1994 09:13:22 +0700 (SST)
From: "I.Novak" <CHMIGORN%NUSVM.BITNET ":at:" phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Subject: HP 712 VS. IBM POWERPC ON GAUSSIAN 92
To: CHEMISTRY- at -ccl.net
Message-id: <01HK57THRREQ94EFR9 $#at#$ phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Dear Netters,
I am trying to get some info about the ease of installation and
performance of Gaussian 92 on HP 712/60 and IBM PowerPC 40P
platforms. I will summarize the responses since perhaps some
people with tight funding may consider purchasing these two
low-end machines. Thanks!
Dr I.Novak,Dept.of Chemistry,NAtional University of Singapore
Sinagapore 0511
Internet:chmigorn- at -nus.sg
Bitnet: chmigorn-!at!-nusvm
P.S. Any reports of bugs and hitches would be especially welcome.