From chemistry-request&$at$&server.ccl.net Tue Oct 12 22:47:07 1999 Received: from ccl.net (atlantis.ccl.net [192.148.249.4]) by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA06447 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:47:07 -0400 Received: from kitts.u.arizona.edu (fan- at -kitts.U.Arizona.EDU [128.196.137.17]) by ccl.net (8.8.6/8.8.6/OSC 1.1) with ESMTP id WAA00444 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:41:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (fan#* at *#localhost) by kitts.u.arizona.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA22790 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 19:41:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 19:41:53 -0700 (MST) From: Hua-Jun Fan To: chemistry -8 at 8- ccl.net Subject: "conspiring" theory In-Reply-To: <47F7EAA0389AD011840500805FEAB9C60376E31A -A_T- sctms01.sct.ucarb.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hi, CCLers I wonder if anyone on this list have seen/read any papers about "conspiring" theory. To my understanding, the theory states that in the transition metal complexes, the combination of multiple ligand orbitals can provide better interaction with metal than a single ligand orbital does. For example, nitrosyl is a good backbonding ligand with metal. With appropriate symmetry, the combination of (pi)* orbital of dinitrosyl can be even stronger backbonding ligand because the combinated orbital lows its energy from single NO and close to Metal orbitals. Best regards! Huajun