From chemistry-request _-at-_)server.ccl.net Fri Nov  9 11:40:48 2001
Received: from wb486.ch.pwr.wroc.pl ([156.17.2.50])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id fA9GelB16249
	for <chemistry \\at// ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 11:40:47 -0500
Received: by wb486.ch.pwr.wroc.pl
	via smail with stdio
	id <m162DvC-0002V2C*- at -*wb486.ch.pwr.wroc.pl>
	for chemistry*- at -*ccl.net; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:50:22 +0100 (MET)
	(Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #16 built 1998-Dec-01)
Message-Id: <m162DvC-0002V2C*- at -*wb486.ch.pwr.wroc.pl>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:50:22 +0100 (MET)
From: zalesny %-% at %-% wb486.ch.pwr.wroc.pl (Robert Zalesny)
To: alec #at# pesto.q1.fcen.uba.ar, chemistry #at# ccl.net
Subject: Re: No Subject Given By The Author

The method that you wanted to use for geometry optimization is very expensive.
My advice is to use IEFPCM instead. It would be better to exlude cavitation
and dispersion during geometry optimization (as a matter of fact these
two copmponents tend to cancel very often). If you use GAUSSIAN program
it can be achieved by the use of NODIS and NOCAV keywords. For optimized
geometry you can calculate dG with cav. and disp. 
Robert Zalesny
Quantum Chemistry Group
Wroclaw University of Technology