From chemistry-request- at -ccl.net Wed Nov 19 07:12:37 2003
Received: from alcor.rede.usc.es (alcor.rede.usc.es [193.144.75.249])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAJCC6RW025207
	for <chemistry/at/ccl.net>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:12:06 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alcor.rede.usc.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A41B4918A
	for <chemistry/at/ccl.net>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:12:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from qfcronos.usc.es (qfcronos.usc.es [193.144.74.154])
	by alcor.rede.usc.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8D4491B9
	for <chemistry/at/ccl.net>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:12:02 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20031119131217.00a2b690/at/pop.usc.es>
X-Sender: qftjesus/at/pop.usc.es
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:14:00 +0100
To: chemistry/at/ccl.net
From: Jesus Rodriguez-Otero <qftjesus/at/usc.es>
Subject: qcsid(t) size consistent?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: YES (by USC)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear CCL'ers

Is QCISD(T) size consistent??

Jesus Rodriguez-Otero