From chemistry-request#* at *#ccl.net Mon Nov 24 18:29:22 2003
Received: from smtp4.dti.ne.jp (smtp4.dti.ne.jp [202.216.228.39])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAONSiNL010335
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:28:50 -0500
Received: from oemcomputer (PPP105.fukuoka-ip.dti.ne.jp [211.132.92.105]) by smtp4.dti.ne.jp (3.08s) with SMTP id hAONSerL004394 for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:28:42 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <004701c3b2e1$b370b680$695c84d3 ^at^ oemcomputer>
From: "Telkuni" <telkuni[at]venus.dti.ne.jp>
To: <chemistry[at]ccl.net>
Subject: "%mem" trouble of Gaussian
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:21:33 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hello, CCLers.

I like to ask the effect of "%mem=xxx" on Gaussian98W.

I've met curios phenomenon with G98W_ver.A7. However I modified the 
PC's memory "%mem=128MB" to "%mem=512MB" on same calculation, 
there was very little calc time difference between them(57min and 64 min!)

If anyone met same phenomenon, please let me know. 
All responses, I will appreciate. And I will summarize them.


 Sincerely yours,
----------------------------------------------------
      Telkuni Tsuru     telkuni[at]venus.dti.ne.jp