From chemistry-request {*at*} ccl.net Sat Nov 29 11:20:01 2003 Received: from mserv.itpa.lt (mserv.itpa.lt [193.219.53.20]) by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hATGJTNL004990 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:19:30 -0500 Received: from mserv.itpa.lt (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mserv.itpa.lt (8.12.9p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hATGJSVb041849; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:19:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from tamulis~at~mserv.itpa.lt) Received: from localhost (tamulis&$at$&localhost) by mserv.itpa.lt (8.12.9p2/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id hATGJQuE041846; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:19:27 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:19:26 +0200 (EET) From: Arvydas Tamulis To: Telkuni cc: CHEMISTRY~at~ccl.net Subject: MM vs MD In-Reply-To: <001c01c3b5ef$7b28f9c0$2a5c84d3 {*at*} oemcomputer> Message-ID: <20031129181207.W41568-100000~at~mserv.itpa.lt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Dear Prof. Telkuni Tsuru and other Netters, I am working with quantum mechanical Hartree-Fock and Density Functional Methods. Would you be so kind and explane me more detail what it is the difference between methods: 1) MM, describing with force fields and bonding parameters and 2) MD, describing with potential functions ? Which is more exact in comparison with quantum mechanical methods? Thanking you in advance. Best regards, Arvydas Tamulis ******************************************************************* Arvydas Tamulis Doctor of Natural Sciences, senior research fellow Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Theoretical Molecular Electronics and Spintronics Research Group, A. Gostauto 12, Vilnius 2600, Lithuania e-mails: tamulis~at~itpa.lt or arvydas_tamulis~at~yahoo.com WEBsite: http://www.itpa.lt/~tamulis/ fax: +370-5-2125361 Phones: +370-5-2625036 or +370-5-2620861 Home address: Didlaukio 27-40, Vilnius 2057, Lithuania Mobile phone: +370-69919397 ******************************************************************* On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Telkuni wrote: > Hello, CCLers. > > Although I think it is very basic knowledge, I want to know the truth. > > Some papers and books treat AMBER as Molecular Mechanic method > describing with force fields and bonding parameters. But others treat > AMBER as Molecular Dynamic method describing with potential functions. > > Does AMBER belong MM or MD? and or both of them? > > >...All responses, I will appreciate. And I will summarize them. > > > > Sincerely yours, > ---------------------------------------------------- > Telkuni Tsuru telkuni~at~venus.dti.ne.jp > > > > > -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =- > To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line > and send your message to: CHEMISTRY~at~ccl.net > > Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST~at~ccl.net > HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs > > If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer: > Jan Labanowski, jkl~at~ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page) > -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > >