From owner-chemistry "-at-" ccl.net Sun Sep 26 09:56:01 2010 From: "david.anick[a]rcn.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: freezen dihedrals in five-membered rings Message-Id: <-42835-100925234148-27940-cy9PbAnPL6H0G4Vcf8VcmA_+_server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----073d0477c8d0948e272e0d7b7badad3e" Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:41:36 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: [david.anick_+_rcn.com] -------073d0477c8d0948e272e0d7b7badad3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -------073d0477c8d0948e272e0d7b7badad3e Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Reynier,

If you have experimental values for th= e five dihedral angles, then these values come with error bars.  Yo= u cannot expect the five numbers to be compatible exactly as given. = ; Going back to the planar example, if your experimental error is +/- 1 = degree, which would be very good accuracy for such a measurement, your e= xperimental set could be {0,0,0,0,1}, which as we have seen, would be "i= mpossible" when combined.

It sounds to me like what you would wan= t to to is the following.  Fixing the known lengths of each bond in= your ring and the 3-atom angles,  do not seek a geometry that matc= hes all 5 dihedrals perfectly, but instead seek the geometry that minimi= zes the sum of the squares of the differences between its dihedrals and = the target dihedrals.  This is a strictly mathematical problem that= would not use Gaussian at all.  Once you have the "optimum" geomet= ry, i.e. the geometry that most closely matches your five numbers accord= ing to a least-squares criterion, you can then do a single-point calc us= ing Gaussian to see what its energy is.  Or, use the dihedrals that= describe the least-squares geometry and do a constrained opt from there= , but I don't think the geometry will change very much.

Peace,David
---- Original message ----

= Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:11:33 +0200
From: "Reynier Su= ardiaz del R=EDo reynier.suardiaz^^gmail.com" <owner-chemistry-,-ccl.ne= t>
Subject: CCL:G: freezen dihedrals in five-membered rings=
To: "Anick, David " <david.anick-,-rcn.com>
Dear David

Thanks for your answer. You are right at all, the di= hedrals are coupled and the value of one of them depends of the value os= the others, so you can not aspire to have any five values of dihedral. = Certainly, if you have a planar ring you can not change one dihedral (fr= om its 0 degree value) and keeping the rest in that planar form because = they have to change to be a possible geometry. What I am doing is giving= to the dihedral experimental values, so this combinations of dihedral a= re possible. I am not changing one dihedral value and keeping the rest i= n their previous values (sorry if I was not clear enough). But, even cha= nging the five dihedrals to a very similar possible values, the calculat= ion is ending with that error.
I think gaussian is not recognizing th= is new combinations of dihedrals as possible geometries. If I keep froze= n only two dihedral the calculation ends ok but the final obtained confo= rmation have not the five dihedral values that I want (only the two froz= en, the other three change a little). What I want to do is to obtain geo= metrically optimized conformations with the experimental values of the f= ive dihedrals and them, calculate properties. In this way I can see how = this property depends on the puckering of the ring.
I keep working on= it, many thanks for your comments, they are very usefull to me.

= All the best

Reynier

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:01 AM, <= david.anick{}rcn.com> wrote:
Dear Reynier,

What is hap= pening is that when you have a ring, you can't just make the
dihedral= angles anything you want, because there are mathematical relations amon= g them.  To see this, consider a special case where all the atoms l= ie in a plane.  All five dihedral angles equal 0.  If you cons= train all five angles to be zero, Gaussian is happy to optimize this.&nb= sp; Now suppose you change one of the angles, even if you only change it= to +1 degree.  It becomes geometrically IMPOSSIBLE.  Because = four of the five dihedrals are still zero, all five atoms are still forc= ed to lie in a single plane.  Then a mathematical consequence is th= at the fifth dihedral is automatically zero also.  If you tell it t= o make that dihedral equal to +1, you are asking Gaussian to find a geom= etry that mathematically cannot exist.  Guess what: Gaussian cannot= do it, and gives you an error message.  The error message is appro= priate: "error imposing constraints".


If you want to change o= ne dihedral angle a little, you must allow some of the other four dihedr= al angles to adapt to the change.  If you work a little with this, = you will see that two dihedral angles essentially fix a five-member ring= . (This is technically true only if the bond lengths and bond angles are= also fixed, but it is hard to adapt bond lengths and angles to accommod= ate changing dihedral angles.)  Try this: change the dihedral angle= you want to change, and remove three of the other constraints, so that = you are specifying only two of the five dihedral angles.  I think G= aussian will be happy with that and will be able to converge.  If t= hat works maybe you can try specifying three of the dihedrals, or concei= vably, four, if the changes are very small.


You need to think= about what is the question you are trying to answer.  If it's abou= t the flexibility of the ring, your best approach may be to constrain ju= st one dihedral, and let the rest of the ring adapt as it needs to.
<= br>
I hope this has been helpful.
Peace,
David Anick PhD MD
=
---- Original message ----

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:27:14 +0200<= br>From: "Reynier Suardiaz del R=EDo reynier.suardiaz!^!gmail.com" <owner-chemistry{}ccl.n= et>

Subject: CCL:G: freezen dihedrals in five-membe= red rings
<= b>To: "Anick, David " <david.anick{}rcn.com>

Dear D. = Close


Many thanks for your answer, you was right. I typed the= values of the dihedrals with 6 decimal places exactly matching with tho= se of the input structure. Doing this, the geometry optimization have fi= nished without problem in a few iterations. Now what I would like to do = is the following: I want to generate diferent conformations of this fura= nose ring by changing the dihedrals (between permitted values without br= eaking of the ring) and partially optimize this structures (obtained by = slightly changing the dihedral values) and keeping frozen the five dihed= rals. When I try to do this using redundant coordinates in gaussian I ob= tained the same error message than before:


-------------
&= nbsp;Iteration 99 RMS(Cart)=3D  0.00005822 RMS(Int)=3D  0.0095= 5580
 Iteration100 RMS(Cart)=3D  0.00005748 RMS(Int)=3D&nbs= p; 0.00959825
 New curvilinear step not converged.
 Erro= r imposing constraints
 Error termination via Lnk1e in C:\G03W\l= 101.exe at Fri Sep 24 21:05:06 2010.
 Job cpu time:  0 days=   0 hours  0 minutes  1.0 seconds.
 File lengths = (MBytes):  RWF=3D      7 Int=3D  = ;    0 D2E=3D      0 Chk=3D = ;     8 Scr=3D      1
--= ------------

even if I only change one dihedral from its original= value (at the input geometry) in less than one degree,  the calcul= ation ends with the above error message.
Does anybody knows how to do= this in gaussian, I mean, changing the dihedral angles of a five memebe= red ring (from its text input file) and to performe a partial geometrica= l optimization with diferent dihedral angles, other than the one of the = input geometry?

any comment or suggestions are welcome.

th= anks in advance and with very best regards

Reynier


2010/9/22 Close, David M. CLOSED~!~mail.etsu.edu <owner-chemistry]*[ccl.net>


Sent t= o CCL by: "Close, David M." [CLOSED#,#mail.etsu.edu]
Reynier:
 There is no li= mit to how many dihedrals you can freeze.  The problem is that you = typed something wrong.  Notice that the program tried 99 iterations= to fit you frozen coordiate information into the optimization routine.<= br>


Either you connected the coordinates incorrectly, or did = not have enough precision in the frozen coordinate.
So if the input l= ine has something like 10 5 6 8   31.3, first look at the string 10= 5 6 8 and make sure this is correct.  The use a graphics program t= o examine the actual dihedral geometry.  Run through the 4 atoms in= the string 10 5 6 8 and see what the graphic program thinks the dihedra= l angle actually is.  Copy the value to 5-6 decimal places and re e= nter the data.



 If this doesn't work, then you have= to use trial and error.  You said that freezing 2 dihedrals works.=  But how many iterations did it take?  I would expect only 2-= 3.  If more, then refine the coordinates, and then add a third froz= en dihedral.  You can quickly find the offending entry when the opt= imization routine bombs.



 Regards, Dave Close.
<= br>________________________________________
> From: owner-chemistr= y+closed=3D=3Detsu.edu= [A]ccl.net [owner-chemi= stry+closed=3D=3Detsu.edu<= /a>[A]ccl.net] on behal= f of Reynier Suard az reynier.suardiaz(a)gmail.com [owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net]



Sent: Wednesday, Septe= mber 22, 2010 10:49 AM
To: Close, David M.
Subject: CCL:G: freezen= dihedrals in five-membered rings

Sent to CCL by: "Reynier &= nbsp;Suard  az" [reynier.suardiaz]_[gmail.com]
Dear All

I want to generate a l= ot of conformations of furanose ring (or cyclopentane?) and later partia= lly optimize them but keeping frozen the dihedral angles. I am trying to= use redundant coordinates in gaussian writing at the end of the input g= aussian file the desired dihedrals to keep frozen. I am receiving an err= or message when i try to keep frozen more than two dihedral angles (of t= he ring) at the same time. For example if I try to froze the five dihedr= als of the ring I get the following message:




------ Iteration 99 RMS(Cart)=3D  0.00001156 RMS(Int)=3D  0.0= 0309967
 Iteration100 RMS(Cart)=3D  0.00001134 RMS(Int)=3D =  0.00310385
 New curvilinear step not converged.
 E= rror imposing constraints
 Error termination via Lnk1e in C:\G03= W\l101.exe at Mon Sep 20 17:48:17 2010.
 Job cpu time:  0 d= ays  0 hours  0 minutes  1.0 seconds.
 File lengt= hs (MBytes):  RWF=3D      7 Int=3D     &nb= sp;0 D2E=3D      0 Chk=3D      7 Scr=3D &n= bsp;    1
---------

I receive this error message eve= n when I try to freeze the dihedral at the same value they already have = in the initial structure.

Is not possible what am I trying to do?= How can I overcome this problem with gaussian? Is there any other possi= bility to do this kind of partial optimization in five-membered rings? N= ote that I can not freeze all the dihedrals using optimization in intern= al coordinates (opt=3Dz-matrix with a separate input section of "constan= ts") because of to define a z-matrix of a five-membered ring are necesar= y only two dihedrals, so I have to use redundants.



any co= mments or sugestions would be appreciatte

thanks in advance and v= ery best regards

Reynierhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin= /ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://= www.ccl.net/spammers.txt



=


-=3D Th= is is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-
=



E-mail t= o subscribers: CHEMISTRY]*[ccl.net or use:
     http:/= /www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administr= ators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST]*[ccl.net or use
     http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Un= subscribe:
     http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_u= nsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.net/j= obs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry= /announcements/conferences/

Search Messages: http://= www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml





--
reynier
<= a href=3D"http://rincon.uam.es/dir?cw=3D331069946289062" target=3D"_blan= k">http://rincon.uam.es/dir?cw=3D331069946289062




--
reynier=
http://rincon.uam.es/dir?cw=3D331069946289062

-------073d0477c8d0948e272e0d7b7badad3e--