From cmao771[ AT ]charon.chpc.utexas.edu Tue Jan 11 15:49:16 1994 Received: from hermes.chpc.utexas.edu for cmao771 &$at$& charon.chpc.utexas.edu by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id PAA28278; Tue, 11 Jan 1994 15:26:26 -0500 Received: from charon.chpc.utexas.edu by hermes.chpc.utexas.edu (5.64/SMI-3.2) id AA24249; Tue, 11 Jan 94 14:26:25 -0600 Received: by charon.chpc.utexas.edu (5.61/SMI-3.2) id AA72891; Tue, 11 Jan 94 14:26:24 -0600 From: cmao771 "at@at" charon.chpc.utexas.edu (Bersuker) Message-Id: <9401112026.AA72891()at()charon.chpc.utexas.edu> Subject: MM for transition metal cpds To: chemistry ^at^ ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 94 14:26:22 CST Cc: cmao771 <-at-> charon.chpc.utexas.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] Dear Dr. Szilagyi: I agree that problems should be solved with as small as possible efforts. If your problem is solvable with the simple Hooke law, you are justified to do that provided you proved that the results are reliable. But to my knowledge in many (maybe most) cases, even if you are interested just in the nuclear configuration it is impossible to avoid at least qualitative consideration of the electronic structure (see for example the effects of vibronic coupling in my book by Plenum, 1984, or Springer, 1989). You mention the practical difficulties of ab initio calculations for these systems (I agree with your reasoning), but there is a variety of semiempirical methods which are much more reasonable and adequate to the real physical and chemical problems. I am now working on a relatively simple (practically acceptable) method of modeling TM systems that includes the d-electron effects I suggested earlier. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Isaac B. Bersuker | E-mail: Dept. of Chemsitry | cmao771 \\at// charon.chpc.utexas.edu Univeristy of Texas at Austin | Vox: (512) 471-4671 Austin, TX 78712 | Fax: (512) 471-8696 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *