From CHMIGORN@NUSVM.NUS.SG Thu Dec 1 22:16:30 1994 Received: from phem3 for CHMIGORN@NUSVM.NUS.SG by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id WAA00512; Thu, 1 Dec 1994 22:00:16 -0500 Received: from NUSVM.NUS.SG (MAILER@NUSVM) by phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu (PMDF V4.2-13 #5888) id <01HK57THRREO94EFR9@phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>; Thu, 1 Dec 1994 22:00:10 EDT Received: from NUSVM.NUS.SG (NJE origin CHMIGORN@NUSVM) by NUSVM.NUS.SG (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with RFC822 id 6033; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:17:50 +0800 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 1994 09:13:22 +0700 (SST) From: "I.Novak" Subject: HP 712 VS. IBM POWERPC ON GAUSSIAN 92 To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net Message-id: <01HK57THRREQ94EFR9@phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Dear Netters, I am trying to get some info about the ease of installation and performance of Gaussian 92 on HP 712/60 and IBM PowerPC 40P platforms. I will summarize the responses since perhaps some people with tight funding may consider purchasing these two low-end machines. Thanks! Dr I.Novak,Dept.of Chemistry,NAtional University of Singapore Sinagapore 0511 Internet:chmigorn@nus.sg Bitnet: chmigorn@nusvm P.S. Any reports of bugs and hitches would be especially welcome.