SUMMARY: Wilson Out-Of-Plane Coordinate



         Dear CCLers
 	A week ago I asked the following question:
 > 	Could someone explain me what exactly the Wilson out-of-plane
 > 	coordinate is?
 >
 > 	It is used in forcefields like CFF91 or ESFF (Discover, MSI).
 > 	The functional form is
 >
 > 		___
 > 		\  '    2
 > 		 >   K X
 > 		/__,  i
 > 		 i
 >
 >
 > 	The manual only says:
 >
 > 	"The functional form of the out-of-plane energy ..., where the
 > 	coordinate is an average of the three possible angles associated
 > 	with the out-of-plane center. The single parameter that is
 > 	associated with the central atom is a fit quantity."
 >
 > 	I have the corresponding reference
 >
 > 	Wilson, E. B.; Decius, J. C.; Cross, P. C. Molecular Vibrations,
 > 	Dover, New York (1980).
 >
 > 	but we don't have the book here.
 	The answers I received are appended.
 	Thanks a lot folks.
 	Stefan
         Stefan Beyreuther
                                          Anorganisch-Chemisches Institut
         fon +49-6221-548634                      Universitaet Heidelberg
         fax +49-6221-545707                             69120 Heidelberg
         e-mail stefan #*at*# indi.aci.uni-heidelberg.de                 Germany
 On Sep 10,  6:41pm, Ernst U. Wallenborn wrote:
 > Subject: Re: CCL:Wilson Out-Of-Plane Coordinate
 >
 > Hi,
 >
 >
 > i think you are referring to what is called term (4)
 > of the cvff91 forcefield in the Discover manual.
 > Wilson, Decius and Cross say:
 >
 > -----quote-----
 >           3                    1"
 >          /                theta  `
 >         /                          `
 > 1------4  phi_1              1-------4----------2,3
 >         \
 >          \
 >           2
 >
 > The basic definition of the angle involved may be given as
 >
 >                      e_42 x e_43
 > 	sin theta =----------------   * e_41
 >                        sin phi_1
 > -----unquote-----
 >
 > i.e. the angle is defined as the one between the bond and the plane
 > formed by the three other atoms. Since there are three posssibilities
 > to choose (atoms 1, 2, 3) Discover takes an average and uses this
 > for the calculations.
 >
 > Hope this helps
 >
 >
 > --
 > Ernst-Udo Wallenborn
 > Laboratorium fuer Physikalische Chemie
 > ETH Zentrum
 > CH-8092 Zuerich
 >
 >-- End of excerpt from Ernst U. Wallenborn
 On Sep 10, 12:42pm, Peter Shenkin wrote:
 > Subject: CCL:Wilson Out-Of-Plane Coordinate
 > On Sep 10,  4:29pm, Stefan Beyreuther wrote:
 > > Subject: CCL:Wilson Out-Of-Plane Coordinate
 > > 	Could someone explain me what exactly the Wilson out-of-plane
 > > 	coordinate is?
 >
 > If A, B and C are connected to a common "central" atom, D, then
 > the angle that the AD vector makes with the BDC plane is a Wilson
 > angle.  The angle that the BD vector makes with the ADC plane
 > is another one.
 >
 > MMFF (Tom Halgren's Merck Molecular Force Field) also uses these.
 >
 > 	-P.
 >
 > --
 > ****** ********** In Memoriam, Bill Monroe, 1911 - 1996 ******************
 > * Peter S. Shenkin, Chemistry, Columbia U., 3000 Broadway, Mail Code 3153,*
 > ** NY, NY  10027;  shenkin #*at*# columbia.edu;  (212)854-5143;  FAX:
 678-9039 ***
 > MacroModel WWW page: http://www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/chemistry/mmod/mmod.html
 >
 >-- End of excerpt from Peter Shenkin
 On Sep 11, 10:32am, Tom Sundius U of Helsinki +358 0 1918339 wrote:
 > Subject: CCL:Wilson Out-Of-Plane Coordinate
 >
 > > 	Could someone explain me what exactly the Wilson out-of-plane
 > > 	coordinate is?
 >  ...
 > > 	I have the corresponding reference
 >
 > > 	Wilson, E. B.; Decius, J. C.; Cross, P. C. Molecular Vibrations,
 > > 	Dover, New York (1980).
 > > 	but we don't have the book here.
 >
 >    Another reference, which may be very helpful, is
 >    S. Califano: Vibrational States, J. Wiley & Sons, London (1976)
 >    ISBN 0-471-12996-8 (there may be a new edition of this useful book)
 >    Chapter 4 of this book deals with the Wilson internal coordinates.
 >
 >    Sometimes the out-plane bend coordinate is also defined as
 "impromper
 >    torsion" which involves the dihedral angle between two adjoining
 planes.
 >    The difference between the two definitions is, however, insignificant
 for
 >    an (almost) planar configuration.
 >
 > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 > !  Tom Sundius, Dept. of Physics   Internet: Tom.Sundius #*at*# Helsinki.fi
 !
 > !  University of Helsinki, Finland          sundius #*at*# phcu.helsinki.fi
 !
 > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 >
 >-- End of excerpt from Tom Sundius U of Helsinki +358 0 1918339