On Mar 7, 2006, at 9:13
PM, Gonzalo Jimenez Oses gonzalo.jimenez*dq.unirioja.es wrote:
Sent to CCL by: "Gonzalo Jimenez Oses"
[gonzalo.jimenez{:}dq.unirioja.es]
Dear
CCL'ers:
I wonder if
there is any short way to stablish a coherent relationship between the free
solvation energy (or, at least, the electrostatic part) obtained through a PCM
method (IEF-PCM, C-PCM, D-PCM) and the dipole (or any other multipole) moment of
a molecule.
I have read that solvation models based on a multipole
moment expansion (MPE) of the solute charge distribution, like the Onsagers
original model, solvation is described explicitly in terms of a dipole
moment.
However, solvation models based in an apparent surface
charge (ASC) like PCM seem not to take the multipole moments into consideration
in a explicit way.
Could anyone shed some light into this question, please?
Thank you very much in
advance,
Gonzalo
-= This is
automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
To recover the email address of the author of the message, please
change
the strange characters on the top line to the | sign. You
can also
look up the X-Original-From: line in the mail
header.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
If your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error,
check:
--
Christopher J. Cramer
University
of Minnesota
Department of
Chemistry
207 Pleasant St.
SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455-0431
--------------------------
Phone:
(612) 624-0859 || FAX:
(612) 626-2006
Mobile:
(952) 297-2575
cramer|pollux.chem.umn.edu
http://pollux.chem.umn.edu/~cramer
(website includes information about the textbook
"Essentials
of Computational
Chemistry: Theories and Models,
2nd Edition")