From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Apr 26 14:01:00 2006 From: "Jozsef Csontos jozsefcsontos(_)creighton.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Gaussian problems Message-Id: <-31600-060426120003-12690-eXeb3Gw0lzi/L5RyWD4DFw(~)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Jozsef Csontos Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:59:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Jozsef Csontos [jozsefcsontos+*+creighton.edu] Hi, in the first case, the first 1 means charge and the second one means multiplicity, so your conformations are charged? If not, that's the problem. On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:26 -0400, Melanie Trusselle mt237(!)bath.ac.uk wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Melanie Trusselle" [mt237]|[bath.ac.uk] > Dear All, > I am a new user of Gaussian and have encountered two problems that I have been unable to resolve. The first problem is the calculation of the energy barrier between two conformers. I am using QST2 for this and my input is below. > > %chk=QST2.chk > %mem=500MB > %nproc=1 > pm3 Opt=QST2 > > find barrier for chair-boat interconversion > 1 1 > zmatrix of first structure > > 1 1 > zmatrix of second structure > > This input gives the error message shown below: > > Symbolic Z-matrix: > End of file in GetChg. > Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/local/g03/l101.exe at Tue Apr 25 14:53:45 2006. > Job cpu time: 0 days 0 hours 0 minutes 2.1 seconds. > File lengths (MBytes): RWF= 7 Int= 0 D2E= 0 Chk= 1 Scr= 1 > > I believe it relates to a lack of memory so I have tried changing %mem and have specifed extra memory when submitting the job but this has not solved the problem. I an aware that this question has been asked previously, and appologies for asking it again but there is no answer available. > > I am also interested in obtaining the J coupling constants for a molecule. I have used the following commands: > > nmr=SpinSpin b3lyp/6-31g(d) geom=connectivity > > An section of the output is: > > Total nuclear spin-spin coupling J (Hz): > 1 2 3 4 5 > 1 0.000000D+00 > 2 0.482568D+02 0.000000D+00 > 3 0.581831D+02 0.557526D+01 0.000000D+00 > 4 0.167946D+03 -0.143914D+00 -0.160153D+01 0.000000D+00 > 5 0.107532D+01 0.576884D+02 -0.428170D+00 0.621590D+01 0.000000D+00 > > > This is different from what I was expecting and I do not know how to relate it to my NMR specra or even if I have given the correct input. > If anyone can advise me on these matters I would be most grateful. > Thank you in advance. > > Melanie Trusselle > mt237#,#bath.ac.uk > University of Bath, UK> > > -- Jozsef Csontos, Ph.D. Department of Biomedical Sciences Creighton University, Omaha, NE