CCL:G: Method for Frequency Calculations
- From: "Abrash, Samuel"
<sabrash/a\richmond.edu>
- Subject: CCL:G: Method for Frequency Calculations
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:57:15 -0400
Sent to CCL by: "Abrash, Samuel" [sabrash(-)richmond.edu]
If you choose a DFT Method with a biggish basis set, you can get within
a few % of literature values. People who do matrix isolation
spectroscopy and commonly use Gaussian for vibrational spectrum
calculations usually use B3LYP/6-311++G**.
You can also get a sense of the accuracy by going to CCCBDB and going to
scaling factors. The closer the scaling factor is to one for a
combination of theory and basis set, the more accurate it is.
HF performs worse than MP2 as far as absolute frequencies go, but tends
to have frequency patterns that match experiment better. MP2 gives
smaller scaling factors but can be unpredictable regarding whether
frequencies are over or underestimated.
Best regards,
Sam Abrash
Samuel A. Abrash
Department of Chemistry
University of Richmond
Richmond, VA 23173
Phone: 804-289-8248
Fax: 804-287-1897
E-mail: sabrash#%#richmond.edu
Web-page: http://oncampus.richmond.edu/~sabrash
"Rabbi Yitzhak said: At the time God created the world and desired to
reveal the depth of His being from out of the hidden, the light came
> from the darkness and they were joined together. Because of this, out
of darkness came the light and out of the hidden came the revealed and
out of the good came evil and out of mercy came severe judgement, and
everything is intertwined with everything else...the good inclination
and the evil inclination, the right and the left." - The Zohar
-----Original Message-----
> From: owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:15 AM
To: Abrash, Samuel
Subject: CCL: Method for Frequency Calculations
Sent to CCL by: "Soren Eustis" [soren__jhu.edu]
Disregarding any concerns with processor time and assuming extensive
basis
sets, what is generally accepted to be the most accurate method for
frequency calculations of small (non-metallic) molecules? I have heard
MP2
is not that great, but HF and DFT perform better? Am I on the right
path
here?http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp-:-//www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp-:-//www.ccl.net/spammers.txt