From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Feb 24 13:50:01 2010 From: "Greg Warren greg . eyesopen.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Call for Papers fall ACS Boston 2010 Message-Id: <-41326-100224134744-23661-6wKlPeCehOBljORFADvong- -server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Greg Warren Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BB3CCF2D3D6B094D96588383620C5F3E4CFE0633DCEXVMBX01811ex_" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:47:36 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Greg Warren [greg{=}eyesopen.com] --_000_BB3CCF2D3D6B094D96588383620C5F3E4CFE0633DCEXVMBX01811ex_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The organizers would like to invite the submission of abstracts for several= talk openings in the following symposium. "Docking and Scoring: What have we learned and where are we now?" Session 1 (half day): Learnings from docking & scoring evaluations with a p= harmaceutically relevant data set For the past five years, docking & scoring program developers and applicati= on scientists have been invited to the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Collegeville, = PA site to evaluate their software on GSK proprietary data sets. During th= is session some of those who took up the offer will share their insights fr= om running evaluations on these sets without knowing the conformations or a= ffinities of compounds ahead of time. They will share learnings towards im= proving their docking & scoring software. Session 2 (half day): Computational Approaches for Fragment Screening The chairs of the session are seeking abstract submissions in the area of c= omputational approaches for fragment screening. We are especially interest= ed in fragment pose predictions with RMSD or other applicable metric comput= ed for docked fragments (where the molecular weights of the fragments are <= 250 Daltons). Additionally, presentations will be considered which focus o= n enrichment - ROC or BEDROC values should be included if appropriate. Ana= lysis centering on diversity of actives retrieved (i.e. scaffold hopping) i= s of interest. Session 3 (full day): A Review of Docking Programs A 2004 symposium at the Philadelphia ACS meeting featured a day of overview= presentations by the developers of a large number of docking algorithms. = In an effort to find out what has changed in the last six years we are orga= nizing a day long review of docking programs. Instead of an overview we ar= e requesting that algorithm developers spend 15 minutes describing the new = features in and improvements to their algorithms over the last six years. = The last 10 minutes of the presentation will focus on algorithm performance= for two tasks against public data sets. The first task will be binding mo= de prediction against the 85 structures in the Astex data set. The second = task will be virtual screening performance against the DUD data set. There= will be two speaking slots that are open for abstract submission. The rem= aining speaking slots will be by invitation. There are 2 to 3 speaking slots in Session 2 and two speaking slots in sess= ion 3. The abstract submission deadline is March 30. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ABSTRACTS: Please go to http://abstracts.acs.org and login = with your ACS ID. If you do not have an ACS ID, please follow the 'Registering is easy' link below the login boxes to get an ACS ID. Once you have logged in: - Under the 'Submission' heading click on the 'Create New Abstract' link. - This link takes you to a listing of all the Divisions. Click the blue box next to COMP to see all of the symposia being organized by COMP. - Click on the "The PDB and Chemistry (Oral)' entry. This highlights the "= The PDB and Chemistry" Symposium. - Click the 'Save' button under the list to move to the 'Instructions' page= . - Go to the bottom of the 'Instructions' page and click the 'Next' button. - Enter your author(s) and institution(s) information, title, and abstract. - Follow the detailed directions There is the ability to include Figures and Tables, and you can edit your a= bstract after it is submitted. Most Sincerely, Neysa Nevins, Georgia McGaughey and Gregory Warren --_000_BB3CCF2D3D6B094D96588383620C5F3E4CFE0633DCEXVMBX01811ex_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The organizers would like to invite the submission of = abstracts for several talk openings in the following symposium.

 

"Docking and Scoring:  What have we learned and where are we now?"<= /b>

Ses= sion 1 (half day): Learnings from docking & scoring evaluations with a pharmaceutically relevant data set
For the past five years, docking & scoring program developers and application scientists have been invited to the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Collegeville, PA site to evaluate their software on GSK proprietary data se= ts.  During this session some of those who took up the offer will share th= eir insights from running evaluations on these sets without knowing the conform= ations or affinities of compounds ahead of time.  They will share learnings towards improving their docking & scoring software.


Session 2 (half day): Computational Approaches for Fragment Screenin= g

The chairs of the session are seeking abstract submissions in the area of computational approaches for fragment screening.  We are especially interested in fragment pose predictions with RMSD or other applicable metri= c computed for docked fragments (where the molecular weights of the fragments= are <250 Daltons).  Additionally, presentations will be considered whic= h focus on enrichment - ROC or BEDROC values should be included if appropriat= e.  Analysis centering on diversity of actives retrieved (i.e. scaffold hopping) is of interest.


Ses= sion 3 (full day): A Review of Docking Programs
A 2004 symposium at the Philadelphia ACS meeting featured a day of overview presentations by the developers of a large number of docking algorithms.  In an effort to find out what has changed in the last six years we ar= e organizing a day long review of docking programs.  Instead of an overv= iew we are requesting that algorithm developers spend 15 minutes describing the= new features in and improvements to their algorithms over the last six years.  The last 10 minutes of the presentation will focus on algorithm performance for two tasks against public data sets.  The first task wi= ll be binding mode prediction against the 85 structures in the Astex data set.  The second task will be virtual screening performance against the DUD data set.  There will be two speaking slots that are open for abstract submission.  The remaining speaking slots will be by invitation.

There are 2 to 3 speaking slots in Session 2 and two speaking slots in sess= ion 3.  The abstract submission deadline is March 30.

 

INSTRUCT= IONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ABSTRACTS:

 

Please g= o to http://abstracts.acs.o= rg and login with your ACS ID.  If
you do not have an ACS ID, please follow the 'Registering is easy'
link below the login boxes to get an ACS ID.

Once you= have logged in:
- Under the 'Submission' heading click on the 'Create New Abstract' link. - This link takes you to a listing of all the Divisions.  Click the blue box next to COMP to see all of the symposia being organized by
COMP.
- Click on the "The PDB and Chemistry (Oral)' entry.  T= his highlights the "The PDB and Chemistry" Symposium.
- Click the 'Save' button under the list to move to the 'Instructions' page= .
- Go to the bottom of the 'Instructions' page and click the 'Next' button.<= br> - Enter your author(s) and institution(s) information, title, and abstract.=

- Follow= the detailed directions

 

There is= the ability to include Figures and Tables, and you can edit your abstract after= it is submitted.

 

Most Sin= cerely,

&nb= sp;

Neysa Ne= vins, Georgia McGaughey and Gregory Warren

 

 

 

--_000_BB3CCF2D3D6B094D96588383620C5F3E4CFE0633DCEXVMBX01811ex_--