Sent to CCL by: "Venable, Richard (NIH/NHLBI) [E]"
[venabler!=!nhlbi.nih.gov]
Given that RESP/ESP methods are **not** used for the development of
CHARMM force fields (a fragment approach similar to OPLS is used),
the compatibility of molecules with RESP-based charges with the rest
of the CHARMM force fields is somewhat questionable. The use of
other approaches, notably the CHARMM General force field (CGenFF),
is recommended instead of ad hoc web servers for extending the
CHARMM force field to new molecules.
I did not see anything on the q4md site which discussed this, or
that gave any hints about validation of the molecular descriptions
produced in the context of CHARMM and its distributed force fields.
--
Rick Venable 5635 FL/T906
Membrane Biophysics Section
NIH/NHLBI Lab. of Computational Biology
Bethesda, MD 20892-9314 U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905 venabler AT nhlbi*nih*gov
On 11/4/10 5:50 AM, "Barry Hardy barry.hardy*o*vtxmail.ch"
<owner-chemistry**ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: FyD [fyd]*[q4md-forcefieldtools.org]
Dear All,
I am pleased to announce the release of R.E.D. Server 2.0.
See http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/.
R.E.D. Server is a web service designed to automatically derive RESP
and ESP charges, and to build force field libraries for new
molecules/molecular fragments. R.E.D. Server provides to computational
biologists involved in AMBER, CHARMM, GLYCAM & OPLS force field based
biological studies the software and hardware required for charge
derivation and force field library building.
See http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/faq.php
& http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/news.php