CCL: On "defending" and "opposing" science
- From: "Mezei, Mihaly" <mihaly.mezei :
mssm.edu>
- Subject: CCL: On "defending" and "opposing"
science
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:41:52 +0000
Sent to CCL by: "Mezei, Mihaly" [mihaly.mezei-.-mssm.edu]
Greetings,
This thread has touched upon many important issues so I feel justified to
include one more: the abdication of responsibilities of many editors. Like one
of the posters' experience where an editor ignored a referee suggestion because
of two other referees' opposing view, I had editor ignoring my specific
arguments against a referee's (negative) argument and telling me that I have to
convince that referee (not him). I suggest that the community insist of the
editors being more than simple vote counters; instead they should actively
arbitrate the discussion between the author(s) and referees. This way there
would be less need for a post-publication discussion. There is, of course,
always the avenue of publishing a comment on a paper in the traditional way.
Mihaly Mezei
Department of Structural and Chemical Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Voice: (212) 659-5475 Fax: (212) 849-2456
WWW (MSSM home): http://www.mountsinai.org/Find%20A%20Faculty/profile.do?id=0000072500001497192632
WWW (Lab home - software, publications): http://inka.mssm.edu/~mezei
WWW (Department): http://atlas.physbio.mssm.edu