CCL: MM RMSD
- From: Michel Petitjean <petitjean.chiral{=}gmail.com>
- Subject: CCL: MM RMSD
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:23:16 +0200
Sent to CCL by: Michel Petitjean [petitjean.chiral*gmail.com]
Pls. have a look at the DIVCF software:
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.freeware.html
It clusters the conformers and exhibits the "mean" conformer within
each cluster.
The number of clusters is computed from the input data.
No cut-off is needed.
Best regards,
Michel Petitjean
MTi, INSERM UMR-S 973, University Paris 7,
35 rue Helene Brion, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France.
Phone: +331 5727 8434; Fax: +331 5727 8372
E-mail: petitjean.chiral- -gmail.com (preferred),
michel.petitjean- -univ-paris-diderot.fr
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html
2017-06-16 11:39 GMT+02:00 Nico Grimblat nicogreen6 ~ gmail.com
<owner-chemistry- -ccl.net>:
> Sent to CCL by: "Nico Grimblat" [nicogreen6]![gmail.com]
> Dear all,
>
> I'm working with organic molecules performing conformational searches with
tinker employing MMFF and MM3 with dielectric constant 80 to avoid hydrogen
bonds.
> This generates a lot of conformations, including some that the only
difference is a 60 variation of a H of an hydroxy group.
> Since I will be performing DFT optimization is extremely likely that the
confirmations that have such difference will be the same after optimization.
> Based on this idea, I was thinking in performing a RMSD comparison in order
to compare by a script all molecules and remove the ones that will end up in the
same optimised molecule as others.
> What is the cutoff that will remove this kind of conformations and be able
to keep the ones that are different enough to question the geometry of the
optimised molecule.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nico