Dear friends and members of our Society,
my proposal to all of you is not to react to questions which
are sent by people who just present their name and a
personal e-mail address but not the name of their
institution (see the e-mail below, which was sent to the
list just recently).
Best regards
Hugo
Prof. Dr. Hugo Kubinyi, Donnersbergstrasse 9
D-67256 Weisenheim am Sand, Germany
FAX +49-6353-508233, E-mail kubinyi#,#t-online.de
HomePage http://home.t-online.de/home/kubinyi
"Guosheng Wu" <wu_guosheng2002|-|yahoo.com> wrote:
> ---
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I wonder if anyone has done detailed analysis of force field
> on the performance of protein-ligand docking?
>
> It seems that the Class I force field (CHARMM, AMBER,...) were
> parameterized for protein and DNA systems, while the Class II
> force field(MM3, MMFF94, CFF95...)is best for small organic
> molecules.
>
> The issue comes when one is interested in protein-ligand docking:
> what kinds of potentials and parameters should be used for
> inter-molecular interactions(energies & forces)?
>
> Maybe most studies simply use the force field of Class I, but
> will that bring significant error to the docking results?
>
> I heard there has been progress on more "generalized" force field
> which is supposed to fit both big and small molecules.
>
> I wonder if there has any systematical study on the effect of force field
> (class I, II, mixed, or "generalized") on the final docking results.
> Maybe this error can be smaller than errors from other kinds of approximations,
> such as limitation of sampling, so not a big deal?
>
> Hope to get some perspectives from the list, and thanks a lot in advance.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Guosheng Wu
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> qsar_society mailing list
> qsar_society]|[accelrys.com
> http://ftp2.accelrys.com/mailman/listinfo/qsar_society
>
Received on 2003-06-17 - 07:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2005-11-24 - 10:21 GMT