Re: QSAR - conformation vs conformer

From: Andrei I. Khlebnikov <aikhl{}nm.ru>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:22:12 +0600

Phil,

It is generally accepted that specific spatial arrangement of atoms, i.e. a
point in a multidimensional conformational space (CS), should be called a
conformation. The term "conformer" refers to real substance and means a set
of conformationally similar relatively stable molecules, i.e. a set of
points in the vicinity of local energy minimum in CS.

Sincerely,
Andrei Khlebnikov

mailto:aikhl__nm.ru
http://aikhl.nm.ru/eindex.html

----------
> От: Hammond, Phil <phil.hammond _ targacept.com>
> Кому: qsar_society * accelrys.com
> Тема: QSAR - conformation vs conformer
> Дата: 17 января 2004 г. 2:29
>
> NB: Unless you reset the To: line, your reply goes to the entire list
> ---
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if anyone has favorite definitions for conformation and
> conformer that they might be willing to share. There is some discussion
in
> our group with regards to which should be used for a single, specific
> spatial arrangement of the atoms of a compound.
>
> For example " The lowest energy conformation was found to be..." or "The
> conformer showing the lowest energy was found to be..."
>
> Any insight would be appreicated. Is there a standard that is now
> recommended in publications?
>
> Phil Hammond
> _______________________________________________
> qsar_society mailing list
> qsar_society . accelrys.com
> http://ftp2.accelrys.com/mailman/listinfo/qsar_society
Received on 2004-01-17 - 00:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2005-11-24 - 10:21 GMT