Re: QSAR - conformation vs conformer

From: Kendall N. Houk <houk++chem.ucla.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:12:58 -0800

One other point of interest: conformer is a contraction of
"conformational isomer" so refers to a minimum as opposed to
conformation which may be minimum, transition state, or something in
between. Ken

--

Received on 2004-01-18 - 03:50 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pavel A. Petukhov: "RE: QSAR - conformation vs conformer"
Previous message: Kendall N. Houk: "Re: QSAR - conformation vs conformer"
Maybe in reply to: Hammond, Phil: "QSAR - conformation vs conformer"
Next in thread: Pavel A. Petukhov: "RE: QSAR - conformation vs conformer"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2005-11-24 - 10:21 GMT