From:	Alessandro Pandini <a.pandini <-at-> csrsrc.mi.cnr.it>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:39:26 +0200
Subject:	CCL:Rotamer library backbone dependent

From:	Georg Schreckenbach <h.g.schreckenbach %! at !% dl.ac.uk>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:26:51 +0100
Subject:	Summary: all-electron basis sets for actinides

From:	John Kerkines <jkerk -x- at -x- arnold.chem.uoa.gr>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:47:16 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject:	Re: CCL:triplet and singlet gap of C2

From:	Daniel Severance <dseverance %-% at %-% acadia-pharm.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:06:08 -0700
Subject:	CAS Numbers

From:	Andrzej Leniewski <alenie ^at^ chem.uw.edu.pl>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:12:16 +0200
Subject:	Re: CCL:isomer software

From:	Christoph Steinbeck <steinbeck' at 'ice.mpg.de>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:21:02 +0200
Subject:	Re: Is CML dead?

From:	"Rzepa, Henry" <h.rzepa : at : ic.ac.uk>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:03:12 +0100
Subject:	Re: CCL:Is CML dead?

From:	David van der Spoel <spoel<;at;>xray.bmc.uu.se>
Date:	Sat, 8 Jul 2000 23:02:25 +0200 (CEST)
Subject:	Re: CCL:Is CML dead?

From:	Peter Shenkin <shenkin-0at0-schrodinger.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:08:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:	Re: CCL:Is CML dead?

From:	Lin Kui <linkui<;at;>bic.nus.edu.sg>
Date:	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:03:53 +0800
Subject:	How flexible a peptide ligand can be?