From Eugenia.Migliavacca ":at:" ict.unil.ch Fri Apr 18 13:37:08 1997 Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch for Eugenia.Migliavacca -x- at -x- ict.unil.ch by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA00225; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:51:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199704181651.MAA00225 _-at-_)www.ccl.net> Received: from pcbep5005c.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 18:50:59 +0200 X-Sender: emigliav ^%at%^ ulys.unil.ch X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 18:52:25 +0200 To: chemistry-: at :-www.ccl.net From: Jenny Subject: radical AM1 geometry optimization Dear CCL, I would like to know which is the best method to optimize radicals (C; N; O) using AM1 as implemented in MOPAC. In particular, is it better to use UHF or open-shell RHF approximation to obtain a good geometry? Any literature reference is appreciated. Thank you in advances, Eugenia Migliavacca Institut de Chimie Thérapeutique BEP CH-1015 Dorigny-Lausanne Tèl.: +41.21.6924529 E-mail: Eugenia.Migliavacca /at\ict.unil.ch