From chemistry-request- at -server.ccl.net  Thu Feb 10 15:11:44 2000
Received: from theory.tc.cornell.edu (THEORY.TC.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.30.174])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA23473
	for <chemistry- at -ccl.net>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 15:11:43 -0500
Received: from tc.cornell.edu (LIGAND.TC.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.20.182]) by theory.tc.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.3/CTC-1.0) with ESMTP id OAA16970 for <chemistry /at\ccl.net>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:04:19 -0500
Sender: richard -x- at -x- tc.cornell.edu
Message-ID: <38A30AB1.68E11745 -x- at -x- tc.cornell.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:00:01 -0500
From: Richard Gillilan <richard {*at*} tc.cornell.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry#* at *#ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Anybody agrees with me?
References: <Pine.GSO.3.95.1000208193939.16653A-100000.,at,.neon.chem.ucla.edu> <38A2BB82.69E59728.,at,.home.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> So, do you REALLY want to see the same monopoly control (what you phrased
> 'standard') in the molecular modelling software industry ????
> Do you want a single large corporation to stifle innovation, keep the prices high
> and the quality low in the name of a 'standard' ?
> 
> Zsolt Zsoldos

Does anyone know what share of the market is held by MSI now? I'll bet it's huge.

Richard Gillilan