From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Mar 10 11:46:39 1992 Date: 10 Mar 92 15:09:11 EDT From: UDIM018%FRORS31.BITNET@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU Subject: If it aint broken dont fix it To: chemistry@ccl.net Status: R E. M. EVLETH Dynamique des Interactions Moleculaires Universite Pierre et Marie Curie 4 Place Jussieu, Tour 22, Paris 75005 (1) 44 27 42 08 UDIM018 at FRORS31 I think the current journal referee system works better than any other I can imagine and only minor modifications are necesssary. If you look around this world you'll see things a lot worse. Personally, even after nearly 20 years here in France, naturalized and as culturally adapted as one can be I still can not see substituting an anonymous evaluation with one from one can "get to". It can and does happen here with regard to promotions and various grants. The French call it "piston". However, in all cultures (we function in a trans-cultural scientific environment) there will be "clubs", networks of friends and buddies, people who know on another and other forms of tribalisms and those who have a meritorious approach will wage an unending battle against the worse features of these natural human interactions. A reviewer is always influenced by the presence of a well known author (particularly a friend) from a well known institution on a paper. A good reviewer knows he will be and attempts to play fair, particularly with regard to an young person having no recognizable place in the scientific pecking order. But having put the "knief" into the back of a personal and close friend more than once is uncomfortable and it would have affected our personal relationships if it were known that it was me who did it. I assume that editors keep list of good referees and weed out bad referees. But the current referee system is pretty much trans-cultural, one knows the rules of the game, one knows one will run into a poor referee, one knows one will have a paper unfairly refused at times. But I think the current system does promote excellence. This current system is a hard on third world research and authors and those who have problems with english. Finally, it is a game.