From Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be  Fri Jul 22 04:55:31 1994
Received: from mserv.rug.ac.be  for Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id EAA11655; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 04:32:36 -0400
Received: from allserv.rug.ac.be by mserv.rug.ac.be with SMTP id AA16691
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:32:57 +0200
Received: by allserv.rug.ac.be (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA01171; Fri, 22 Jul 94 10:29:47 +0200
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:29:47 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Patrick Bultinck <Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be>
Subject: Choice of Z-matrix
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9407221033.A1155-0100000@allserv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 576



Dear Netters,

I was wondering if anyone had some clues or ideas on how to set up a 
Z-matrix.
The trouble is that some of my optimizations do not converge to a 
stationary point. However when I make another alternative Z-matrix I 
converge to the Stat. Point. Now my question is : how does one judge, 
given e.g. five different possibilities, which is the best Z-matrix.

Is this a matter of "Zen" or rather a matter of "science" ?

Thanks for your time, a summary will be made if useful answers get to me.

Patrick, University of Ghent, Belgium

Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be

