From HODGKINE@prince.mm.wyeth.com  Thu Jul 28 10:57:11 1994
Received: from mail1  for HODGKINE@prince.mm.wyeth.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id KAA12228; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:32:27 -0400
Received: from mr.wyeth.com by mail1.wyeth.com (PMDF V4.2-14 #5660) id
 <01HF8J8M1328000LVC@mail1.wyeth.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:36:45 EST
Received: with PMDF-MR; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:33:15 EST
MR-Received: by mta PRIN1; Relayed; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:33:15 -0500
MR-Received: by mta MAIL1; Relayed; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:32:31 -0500
Disclose-recipients: prohibited
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 15:38:18 -0500 (EST)
From: "Hodgkin, Ed" <HODGKINE@prince.mm.wyeth.com>
Subject: Modelling Transition States
To: "chemistry@ccl.net" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-id: <01HF8J8MYB1Y000LVC@mr.wyeth.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
UA-content-id: Modelling Transition States
X400-MTS-identifier: [;51330182704991/169632@PRINCE]
A1-type: MAIL
Hop-count: 1


From: Hodgkin, Ed
Date: Thu, Jul 28, 1994 3:38 PM
Subject: Modelling Transition States
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Dear All

I am hoping to model a reaction mechanism using either MOPAC or Gaussian80 and 
need some help with constructing transition states or following the reaction 
coordinate. I understand it is possible to do this in both packages.

My reaction shows unusual selectivity between two products. Each of the 
products is formed by a concerted intramolecular mechanism, which I imagine is 
the most straightforward case to model. Furthermore reactants and products are 
conformationally constrained so there is no problem with flexibility.

I would be very grateful for any hints you can offer.

Regards,
Edward Hodgkin (hodgkine@prince.mm.wyeth.com)
Wyeth Research (UK)



