From pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu  Tue Apr 25 17:15:35 1995
Received: from pratt.edu  for pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id RAA10395; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:09:37 -0400
Received: by pratt.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA00875; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:08:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:08:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Friedman <pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu>
To: Chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Nine bits v. Eight
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950425164943.562B-100000@acnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


We are purchasing a pentium 100MHZ PC to speed up our runs using Hyperchem
and Gaussian 92W/DFT. I was alerted by several people that many of the newer
PCs use 8 bit SIMMs now. I've gotten differing opinions on whether parity
checking is needed. I would appreciate hearing from anyone with an informed
opinion as to the risks (no pun) involved. Hypercube and Gaussian boffins
especially welcome.
                                                    Thanks,
                                                    Paul Friedman
E-mail pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu

