From borkent@caos.kun.nl  Wed Jul 10 04:13:07 1996
Received: from cammsg1.caos.kun.nl  for borkent@caos.kun.nl
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id DAA14907; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 03:31:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cammsg5 (cammsg5.caos.kun.nl [131.174.88.5]) by cammsg1.caos.kun.nl (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id JAA00532 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 09:31:16 +0200 (MDT)
From: Hens Borkent <borkent@caos.kun.nl>
Message-Id: <199607100731.JAA00532@cammsg1.caos.kun.nl>
Subject: M: negative freq's.
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 09:31:15 +0200 (MDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Dear CCL-ers,

I mis-sent my reaction last week, but I think it is still
relevant, so I repeat it here:
In case you want to get rid of spurious negative frequencies
(which is often not necessary for the conclusions you draw
from a calculation) it helps if you visualize the movement
involved (MOLDEN on unix machines, Re_view on PC's).
I have had examples where these frequencies corresponded
to small deviations from symmetry, and it helped to start
with a perfectly symmetrical structure. E.g. I observed
in an sp3-sp3 chain a motion corresponding to rotation
around the central bond, with a negative frequency, after
minimization. It disappeared after changing the dihedral
angles from 179.5 to 179.9999. (and a full minimization
of course, although you can do a step in between in which
you fix the symmetry).

Best regards,
-- 

  *****    J.H. (Hens) Borkent, CAOS/CAMM Center,
 *CAOS *   P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*   /   *  Tel 0031 24 36 52137  Fax 0031 24 36 52977
 * CAMM*   e-mail: borkent@caos.kun.nl
  *****    http://www.caos.kun.nl/staff/borkent.html

