Summary: Which method is better for a rather big molecule.



 Hi,
 Thanks for the advice. Here's the summary.
 Hi, All,
 I want to optimize the conformations of some big molecules, for example,
 N-methyl-N-octadecylanaline. I think RHF or DFT methods are not suitable
 for this kind big system. Also, some semi-empirical methods are not
 accurate enough for such calculations.
 Which method can do this kind work?
 Thank you very much!
 Y. FAN
 -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
 -- Original Sender Envelope Address: yubofan { *at * } guomai.sh.cn
 -- Original Sender From: Address: yubofan { *at * } guomai.sh.cn
 CHEMISTRY { *at * } www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST { *at * }
 www.ccl.net:
 Coordinator
 MAILSERV { *at * } www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher:
 www.ccl.net
 73
 Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH { *at * } www.ccl.net -- archive
 search
              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
 ===================================================
 FAN, Yubo
 Department of Chemistry
 Fudan University
 Shanghai, 200433
 P. R. China		Voice(86-21)65492222-4294
 ===================================================
 Hello,
 Your molecule is not as big as you think.
 Have you tried the RIS method to find the minimum potential energy
 conformation ? My friends once studied the polybenzozaxine dimer using
 this method, and it worked very well. But you have to write the code or
 find a package containing RIS module.
 Good luck.
 On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, [CN-GB] ~{76S}2(~} wrote:
 > Hi, All,
 >
 > I want to optimize the conformations of some big molecules, for example,
 > N-methyl-N-octadecylanaline. I think RHF or DFT methods are not suitable
 > for this kind big system. Also, some semi-empirical methods are not
 > accurate enough for such calculations.
 >
 > Which method can do this kind work?
 >
 >
 > Thank you very much!
 >
 > Y. FAN
 >
 > -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
 > -- Original Sender Envelope Address: yubofan { *at * } guomai.sh.cn
 > -- Original Sender From: Address: yubofan { *at * } guomai.sh.cn
 > CHEMISTRY { *at * } www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST { *at * }
 www.ccl.net:
 Coordinator
 > MAILSERV { *at * } www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher:
 www.ccl.net
 73
 > Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH { *at * } www.ccl.net --
 archive search
 >              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
 >
 A classic way of handling a molecule of this size is to break it down to
 logical pieces. Perhaps do at least two optimizations 1)
 N-ethyl-N-methylanaline, 2) N-dimethyl-N-alkylamine. Personally, I don't
 know
 of any other way.
 --
 Luke Anthony Burke		tel:609-225-6158 (-6142)
 Professor and Chair,		fax:609-225-6506
 Department of Chemistry		e-mail:
 Rutgers University		burke { *at * } camden.rutgers.edu
 Camden, NJ 08102, USA		http://camchem.rutgers.edu/~burke
 > Hi, All,
 >
 > I want to optimize the conformations of some big molecules, for example,
 > N-methyl-N-octadecylanaline. I think RHF or DFT methods are not suitable
 > for this kind big system. Also, some semi-empirical methods are not
 > accurate enough for such calculations.
 >
 > Which method can do this kind work?
 >
 >
 > Thank you very much!
 >
 > Y. FAN
 I think the best way is to do a DFT calculation, starting with B3LYP/4-31G
 DFT is a good method for large molecules.
 bye,
             *-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*
            /			                     /
           /   Anselmo Elcana de Oliveira            /
          *   Cidade Universitaria Zeferino Vaz     *
         /   IQ - UNICAMP     CEP 13083-970          \
        /   Campinas, SP - Brasil                     \
       *   elcana { *at * } iqm.unicamp.br                       *
      /   http://chope.iqm.unicamp.br                   \
     /                                                   \
    *       To err is human,			         *
   /        To really foul up requires the root password   \
  /				                           \
 *-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*-----*
 	You may use RHF with small basis sets. However, it still
 depends how many memory your computer has.
 =================================================================
 Dr. Buyong Ma             buyong { *at * } ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
 Computational Center for Molecular Structure and Design
 Department of Chemistry
 University of Georgia
 Athens, Georgia 30602 USA            Voice (706) 542-2044
 =================================================================
 On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, [CN-GB] ~{76S}2(~} wrote:
 > Hi, All,
 >
 > I want to optimize the conformations of some big molecules, for example,
 > N-methyl-N-octadecylanaline. I think RHF or DFT methods are not suitable
 > for this kind big system. Also, some semi-empirical methods are not
 > accurate enough for such calculations.
 >
 > Which method can do this kind work?
 >
 >
 > Thank you very much!
 >
 > Y. FAN
 >
 > -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
 > -- Original Sender Envelope Address: yubofan { *at * } guomai.sh.cn
 > -- Original Sender From: Address: yubofan { *at * } guomai.sh.cn
 > CHEMISTRY { *at * } www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST { *at * }
 www.ccl.net:
 Coordinator
 > MAILSERV { *at * } www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher:
 www.ccl.net
 73
 > Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH { *at * } www.ccl.net --
 archive search
 >              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
 >
 >
 Optimize?  You did not indicate what you wish to optimize but I shall
 assume
 that you are looking for the global minimum, i.e. the conformation with the
 minimum energy.  This is a non-trivial task and you want to use classical
 methods to search conformational space for candidates.  I use molecular
 dynamics at 1000 K or 2000 K.  I have also used Crippen's distance geometry
 algorithm.  Jeff Blaney has written a nice implementation of distance
 geometry
 which is available through QCPE.
 Once you have sampled conformational space, you need to minimize each
 structure
 using molecular mechanics and then sort the structures as to energy.  If
 you
 want a good ab initio energy, you then want to apply quantum-mechanical
 methods
 to the best structures identified by the classical approach.  You won't be
 able
 to do the entire problem quantum mechanically.  Millions of structures are
 involved.