From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Feb 29 17:43:11 2000
Received: from Post-Office.UH.EDU (Post-Office.UH.EDU [129.7.1.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA30604
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:43:11 -0500
Received: from CS.UH.EDU (zeus.cs.uh.edu [129.7.192.1])
 by Post-Office.UH.EDU (PMDF V5.2-32 #40812)
 with SMTP id <0FQP00AEWR2P8R@Post-Office.UH.EDU> for chemistry@ccl.net; Tue,
 29 Feb 2000 16:42:25 -0600 (CST)
Received: from blackbird.CS.UH.EDU by CS.UH.EDU (COSC/UH-zeus)	id AA05134; Tue,
 29 Feb 2000 16:42:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: by blackbird.CS.UH.EDU (4.1/UH-4.1)	id AA00223; Tue,
 29 Feb 2000 16:43:06 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 16:42:26 -0600 (CST)
From: Zdenko Tomasic <zdenko@CS.UH.EDU>
Subject: Re: CCL:Lebedev integral meshes
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0002291643320.3229-100000@kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk>
To: andrew.horsfield@materials.ox.ac.uk
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Reply-to: zdenko@CS.UH.EDU
Message-id: <10002292242.AA05134@CS.UH.EDU>

When I needed this, I managed to find out this much:

     refs: V.I. Lebedev
      9th,11th,13th,15th,17th:
     [1] Zh. vychisl. Mat. mat. Fiz., [15],1,48-54 (1975) (russian)
         USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. [16], 44-51 (1975) (eng.)
                                             
      19th,23rd:
     [2] Zh. vychisl. Mat. mat. Fiz., [16],2,293-306 (1976) (russian)
         USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. [16], 10-24 (1976) (eng.)

      29th:
     [3] Sib. Matem. Zh. [18],132 (1977) (russian)
         Siberian Math. J. [18] (1977) (eng.)

35th: (russian PDE conference paper  ed. Sobolev)
( my library could never find the right one, apparently there was a
conference with the same title the same year but with a different editor)

     41st,47th,53rd:  (with A.L.Skorokhodov)
     [4] Ross. Akad. Nauk Dokl. [324],3, (1992)
         Russian Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math. [45], 3, 587-592 (1992)
         
     59th:
     [5] Ross. Akad. Nauk Dokl. [338],4, (1994)
         Russian Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math. [50], 2, 283-286 (1995)


Note that data contain errors and have limited(7-8 digits) working
precision (as opposed to printed precision - 12-15
digits). Recalculation of solutions to nonlinear equations is not trivial. 


