From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Feb 5 16:06:44 2003 Received: from exchange.neokimia.com ([132.210.158.207]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h15L6iI31383 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:06:44 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Benchmarks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:05:21 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Benchmarks Thread-Index: AcLNV2/QzssPdEe3RTas/DBqK3U5RwABAClg From: "Axel Mathieu" To: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h15L6jI31384 I can't answer your question about Gaussian, although I have used ScienceMark to benchmark several of my stations. It may not be the best benchmark available but it can give you a good idea of the performance of your machines. To tell you the truth, I can't remember the source of their code (if they used previously coded algorithms or if they coded it themselves). You'll find it at: http://www.sciencemark.org/ Axel -----Original Message----- From: jmmckel@attglobal.net [mailto:jmmckel@attglobal.net] Sent: 4 février, 2003 11:25 To: chemistry@ccl.net Subject: CCL:Benchmarks Folks, Once upon a time there was used a piece of cde from Gaussian70, I believe, for cpu benchmarks. I believe the code was part of the two electron integral code. Does anyone remember any of this and/or could point me to it? Suggestions for other useful scientific cpu tests are also welcome, particularly if public domain, and would stress the cpu and cpu-memory communication. Thanks! John McKelvey -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =- CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins Ftp: ftp.ccl.net | WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/ | Jan: jkl@ccl.net