From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sun Oct  5 09:39:03 2003
Received: from sunchem.chem.uga.edu (sunchem.chem.uga.edu [128.192.5.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h95DcW59009641
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:38:32 -0400
Received: (qmail 17183 invoked by uid 728); 5 Oct 2003 13:36:01 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 5 Oct 2003 13:36:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:36:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Zhi-Xiang Wang <zxwang.-at-.sunchem.chem.uga.edu>
To: chemistry.-at-.ccl.net
Subject: QM/MM vs. ONIOM
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310050929440.16953-100000.-at-.sunchem.chem.uga.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hi,
    Any comments about the differences between qm/mm and oniom method are 
appreciated. From my point of view, they are quite similar. I hope I can 
get enough replies to give a summary. 
    Thanks

Zhixiang