From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Oct 24 12:37:46 2003
Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (electra.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.23])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9OGbEch004073
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 12:37:14 -0400
Received: from hultin (hultin.chem.umanitoba.ca [130.179.48.60])
	by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id h9OGb9S7027013
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:37:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Phil Hultin" <hultin[at]cc.UManitoba.CA>
To: "Computational Chemistry List" <chemistry[at]ccl.net>
Subject: Advertising
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:37:10 -0500
Message-ID: <MFEKIFDLINLMPCOPEBDGAEGHCNAA.hultin[at]cc.umanitoba.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0107_01C39A23.295958C0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1032; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=7.0
	tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C39A23.295958C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is it just me, or do others agree that commercial advertising such as recent
postings from David Gallagher have no place on CCL?

I have observed an increase in the number of commercial advertisements (as
distinct from comments suggesting that one program/product does a particular
task better or worse than another, coming from persons with no direct
connection to the products in question) over the last year or so, and I
think this has no place on this discussion list.

I may be way off base on this, so what do others think?
Dr. Philip G. Hultin
Associate Department Head and
Associate Professor of Chemistry
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2
(vox) 204-474-9814
(fax) 204-474-7608
mailto:hultin[at]cc.umanitoba.ca
http://www.umanitoba.ca/chemistry/


------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C39A23.295958C0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D437383416-24102003>Is it =
just me, or do=20
others agree that commercial advertising such as recent postings from =
David=20
Gallagher have no place on CCL?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D437383416-24102003></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D437383416-24102003>I have =
observed an=20
increase in the number of commercial advertisements (as distinct from =
comments=20
suggesting that one program/product does a particular task better or =
worse than=20
another, coming from persons with no direct connection to the products =
in=20
question) over the last year or so, and I think this has no place on =
this=20
discussion list.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D437383416-24102003></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D437383416-24102003>I may =
be way off=20
base on this, so what do others think?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Dr. Philip G. Hultin<BR>Associate Department Head=20
and<BR>Associate Professor of Chemistry<BR>University of =
Manitoba<BR>Winnipeg,=20
MB, Canada R3T 2N2<BR>(vox) 204-474-9814<BR>(fax) 204-474-7608<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:hultin[at]cc.umanitoba.ca">mailto:hultin[at]cc.umanitoba.ca</A><=
BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.umanitoba.ca/chemistry/"=20
target=3D_blank>http://www.umanitoba.ca/chemistry/</A> </FONT></P>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C39A23.295958C0--



