From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Apr 29 04:24:36 2004
Received: from aspirine.u-strasbg.fr (aspirine.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.84.250])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3T9OZkh004275
	for <chemistry|at|ccl.net>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 04:24:35 -0500
Received: from hit8.pharma.u-strasbg.fr (hit3.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.85.33])
	(authenticated)
	by aspirine.u-strasbg.fr (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3T8sxf28177;
	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:54:59 +0200
Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.0.20040429112206.0202ff20|at|aspirine.u-strasbg.fr>
X-Sender: rognan|at|aspirine.u-strasbg.fr
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:26:48 +0200
To: Szilveszter Juhos <szilveszter.juhos|at|chemaxon.hu>,
   Tom Halgren <halgren|at|schrodinger.com>, chemistry|at|ccl.net
From: Didier Rognan <didier.rognan|at|aspirine.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: CCL:Validating docking codes
In-Reply-To: <20040429085124.GC543|at|computer.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404281315090.30206-100000|at|iman.schrodinger.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404281719460.11645-100000|at|neva.schrodinger.com>
 <20040429085124.GC543|at|computer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

At 10:51 29/04/2004, Szilveszter Juhos wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:56:08PM -0400, Tom Halgren wrote:
>[a lot of things to clear the database question concerning Glide]
>
>Sorry for my mistake and thank you very much for the precise answer (I
>even messed up ACD with ACS).
>
>Indeed it is the "Rognan set" I was writing about as that is the only
>set I am aware used by many different groups. I do not want to question
>the validation of Glide but want to point the lack of a common, freely
>available, drug/lead-like decoy set that would ease the comparison of
>different docking software.
>
>Cheers:
>Szilva
>
>
>
>-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
>To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
>and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY|at|ccl.net
>
>Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST|at|ccl.net
>HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
>If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
>Jan Labanowski,  jlabanow|at|nd.edu (read about it on CCL Home Page)
>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Dear colleagues,

The dataset you are talking about had been designed 5 years ago using 
rather rough 'drug-likeness' filters when compared to that used now. It is 
true that comparing different docking tools with permanently-upgraded 
datasets is very tricky. Anybody interested in getting an actualised set of 
1,000 randomly-chosen drug-like compounds with today drug-likeness filters 
(e.g. OpenEye rules implemented in FILTER) can contact me.

Regards,

Didier

Didier
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Didier ROGNAN
Directeur de Recherche
CNRS UMR 7081
74, route du Rhin, B.P.24
F-67401 Illkirch

direct line: +33 (0)3 90 24 42 35
secretary: +33(0)3 90 24 42 20
fax: +33 (0)3 90 24 43 10
mobile: +33 (0)6 89 56 24 46
email: didier.rognan|at|pharma.u-strasbg.fr



