Re: CCL:Correlation Coefficient
- From: Rajarshi Guha <rxg218 () psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: CCL:Correlation Coefficient
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:59:24 -0400
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:48 +0800, lhhu () yangtze.hku.hk wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a question about Correlation Coefficient of cross-validation. Can
> anyone tell me how much the value of Correlation Coefficient indicate
> the result is reliable? Certainly I know the larger the value, the more
> reliable the result. I want to know the lowest limit of that value. I read
> some papers that used the Correlation Coefficient value, some values are
> lower than 0.8, is it OK for present them in journals? Or it depends on
> different situation or topic?
There are differing views on the validity of q^2, in that high values of
q^2 do not necessarily indicate a good model in terms of predictive
ability. Some papers that discuss this topic are
(+ at +) ARTICLE{q2-1,
author = {Golbraikh, A. and Tropsha, A.},
title = {Beware of $q^2$},
journal = {J.~Mol.~Graph.~Model.},
year = {2002},
volume = {20},
pages = {269--276},
}
(+ at +) ARTICLE{q2-5,
author = {Norinder, U.},
title = {Single and domain made variable selection in {3D QSAR}
applications},
journal = {J.~Chemomet.},
year = {1996},
volume = {10},
pages = {95--105},
}
(+ at +) ARTICLE{q2-2,
author = {Golbraikh, A. and Shen, M. and Xiao, Z.Y. and Xiao, Y.D.
and Lee, K.H. and Tropsha, A.},
title = {Rational selection of training and test sets for the
development of validated {QSAR} models},
journal = {J.~Comput.~Aid.~Mol.~Des.},
year = {2003},
volume = {17},
pages = {241--253},
}
HTH
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha <rxg218 () psu.edu> <http://jijo.cjb.net>
GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm related to people I don't relate to."
-Calvin