From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue May 17 15:36:04 2005
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4HJa0Ai009186
	for <CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net>; Tue, 17 May 2005 15:36:01 -0400
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so2459478wri
        for <CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net>; Tue, 17 May 2005 12:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=c7MKWlCUMXk2Chc/0rNLdRwIgHC47DdIS/zFzUhshiRFFwyaKkIjxX0r40amDGbOFxIEdTQwKDHnsh1V7rM8UgdIYgtTd5cuZGgO66CeO+d5z4/iffxG+tF4nKMnorgSSFF+U7X03enS0rPcmq87gXaHbik4X+I9vs5uKv0p/wc=
Received: by 10.54.48.24 with SMTP id v24mr4519044wrv;
        Tue, 17 May 2005 11:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.4.42 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2005 11:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <203e36e3050517113622bdba43)at(mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:36:00 -0700
From: Rich McClellan <richmc)at(gmail.com>
Reply-To: Rich McClellan <richmc)at(gmail.com>
To: Mikael Johansson <mpjohans)at(pcu.helsinki.fi>, CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Summary Opteron vs Nocona
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.61.0505171049160.25599)at(soul.it.helsinki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1193_10574499.1116354960034"
References: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0505170025130.14078-100000)at(main.chemistry.unina.it>
	 <Pine.OSF.4.61.0505171049160.25599)at(soul.it.helsinki.fi>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_20_30,
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server.ccl.net

------=_Part_1193_10574499.1116354960034
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Mikael,

The dual core Opterons are pin compatible with current Opterons and only a=
=20
BIOS update should be necessary. Given that most OSes in use support=20
multiple processors, no new drivers, kernel patches, etc., are required.=20
That is, flash your BIOS, install a dual core CPU, boot your OS (with kerne=
l=20
that supports SMP), and you're done. Because the single and dual core=20
processors are pin compatible, Luigi could order/build his cluster today an=
d=20
swap CPUs for dual core Opterons in 6-12 mos.

Rich

On 5/17/05, Mikael Johansson <mpjohans)at(pcu.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Hello Luigi and All!
>=20
> On Tue, 17 May 2005, Luigi Cavallo wrote:
>=20
> > However, there's one point about opterons. AMD just announced dual-core=
=20
> cpus,
> > which should perform far better than the single-core shipped now.
> > I contacted resellers here in italy, and they say that dual-core cpus=
=20
> will be
> > shipped after the summer. If you buy opetrons now they can sell you=20
> single-core.
> > Is this true ? Any out of there has been able to buy AMD with dual-core=
=20
> cpus as
> > the 275 ?
>=20
> I don't know about AMD's mass shipping schedule, but I do know that there
> will always be better and faster chips "after the summer". Or winter or
> whatever time period of choice :-) I don't think it in general is worth
> waiting for the next family of CPU's. Instead, get what is available when
> you need it (if possible, of course). I don't know how much better the
> price/performance ratio of dual cores would be, at least in the beginning=
,
> when counting in all the costs of motherboards etc.
>=20
> Also, after the dual core chips ship, there will be a lag before proper
> drivers/kernel patches for Linux appear. It took a year after release
> before a general AMD64 system could be considered usable for production
> under Linux. OK, the jump to dual core might not be that big, but I would
> be quite surprised if it immediately worked optimally.
>=20
> Have a nice day,
> Mikael J.
> http://www.helsinki.fi/~mpjohans/
>=20
>=20
> -=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =
=3D-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject:=
=20
> line
> and send your message to: CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net
>=20
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to:=20
> CHEMISTRY-REQUEST)at(ccl.net
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>=20
> If your is mail bouncing from ccl.net <http://ccl.net> domain due to spam=
=20
> filters, please
> use the Web based form from CCL Home Page
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>=20
>

------=_Part_1193_10574499.1116354960034
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Mikael,<br>
<br>
The dual core Opterons are pin compatible with current Opterons and
only a BIOS update should be necessary.&nbsp; Given that most OSes in
use support multiple processors, no new drivers, kernel patches, etc.,
are required.&nbsp; That is, flash your BIOS, install a dual core CPU,
boot your OS (with kernel that supports SMP), and you're done.&nbsp;
Because the single and dual core processors are pin compatible, Luigi
could order/build his cluster today and swap CPUs for dual core
Opterons in 6-12 mos.<br>
<br>
Rich<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 5/17/05, <b class=3D"gmail_=
sendername">Mikael Johansson</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpjohans)at(pcu.helsink=
i.fi">mpjohans)at(pcu.helsinki.fi</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt =
0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Hello Luigi and All!<br><br>On Tue, 17 May 2005, Luigi Cavallo wrote:<b=
r><br>&gt; However, there's one point about opterons. AMD just announced du=
al-core cpus,<br>&gt; which should perform far better than the single-core =
shipped now.
<br>&gt; I contacted resellers here in italy, and they say that dual-core c=
pus will be<br>&gt; shipped after the summer. If you buy opetrons now they =
can sell you single-core.<br>&gt; Is this true ? Any out of there has been =
able to buy AMD with dual-core cpus as
<br>&gt; the 275 ?<br><br>I don't know about AMD's mass shipping schedule, =
but I do know that there<br>will always be better and faster chips &quot;af=
ter the summer&quot;. Or winter or<br>whatever time period of choice :-) I =
don't think it in general is worth
<br>waiting for the next family of CPU's. Instead, get what is available wh=
en<br>you need it (if possible, of course). I don't know how much better th=
e<br>price/performance ratio of dual cores would be, at least in the beginn=
ing,
<br>when counting in all the costs of motherboards etc.<br><br>Also, after =
the dual core chips ship, there will be a lag before proper<br>drivers/kern=
el patches for Linux appear. It took a year after release<br>before a gener=
al AMD64 system could be considered usable for production
<br>under Linux. OK, the jump to dual core might not be that big, but I wou=
ld<br>be quite surprised if it immediately worked optimally.<br><br>Have a =
nice day,<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Mikael J.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
 <a href=3D"http://www.helsinki.fi/~mpjohans/">
http://www.helsinki.fi/~mpjohans/</a><br><br><br>-=3D This is automatically=
 added to each message by the mailing script =3D-<br>To send e-mail to subs=
cribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line<br>and send your m=
essage to:&nbsp;&nbsp;
<a href=3D"mailto:CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net">CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net</a><br><br>Send your=
 subscription/unsubscription requests to: <a href=3D"mailto:CHEMISTRY-REQUE=
ST)at(ccl.net">CHEMISTRY-REQUEST)at(ccl.net</a><br>HOME Page: <a href=3D"http://w=
ww.ccl.net">
http://www.ccl.net</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; | Jobs Page: <a href=3D"http://www.ccl.n=
et/jobs">http://www.ccl.net/jobs</a><br><br>If your is mail bouncing from <=
a href=3D"http://ccl.net">ccl.net</a> domain due to spam filters, please<br=
>use the Web based form from CCL Home Page
<br>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-=
+<br><br></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_1193_10574499.1116354960034--


