from solvent structure. More statistical frameworks (likehydrophobicity scales and the like) are really just capturing the same underlying physics, which is why you'll often here people refering to them in the same language (e.g. the hydrophobic effect).
To give a quick example of how the vacuum to water transfer free energy may be negative, while the hydrophobic solvent to water transfer energy may be positive, just think about van der Waals interactions; there are none in vacuum, and plenty between an aromatic system in hydrophobic solvent. The weak dielectric response of hydrophobic solvents (around 2 at the very minimum) gives an added bonus, and as always, entropy is a hard one to deal with perfectly.
But in a nutshell, aromatic certainly do have favorable hydration free energies despite generally considered "hydrophobic". It's not a misnomer, but more a difference in reference state. Of course, every thing is always a little more complicated than what anyone tells you, but that's what makes it all fun.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | David F. Green | | | Postdoctoral Associate | Office: 617-253-5438 | | Division of Bioengineering and Computer | Mobile: 617-953-3922 | | Science & Artificial Intelligence Lab | Fax: 617-252-1816 | | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | | | 32 Vassar St., 32-211 | E-mail: dfgreen !! mit.edu | | Cambridge, MA 02139 | | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ Chemical, , Bond wrote:
Hi there,I am confused with a single concept: what should be the sign for the solvation free energy for a fragment like phenyl?There are many experimental data of solvation free energy for aromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzene, naphthalene, etc, but they are all negative surprisingly. I looked at several papers with models of solvation energy, and their predictions all all have negative solvation energies for those compounds, just like the experiments.Typically when a phenyl group is transfered from water into protein, we would like to say there is a negative(beneficial) desolvation energy, or the usual called hydrophobic effect. And this has been used in tons of models for protein simulation or protein-ligand binding. Note, in this context, the solvation energy (from gas into water) is positive!Is there something wrong over here? Or just some artifact from the fitting? Hope there would be some good comments. Thanks a lot, Bond -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =- To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line and send your message to: CHEMISTRY _()_ ccl.netSend your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST _()_ ccl.net HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobsIf your is mail bouncing from ccl.net domain due to spam filters, pleaseuse the Web based form from CCL Home Page -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+