Re: CCL: W:Solvation free energy for aromatic hydrocarbon
- From: Andreas Klamt <klamt _()_ cosmologic.de>
- Subject: Re: CCL: W:Solvation free energy for aromatic
hydrocarbon
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 07:33:25 +0200
Hi Bond,
the concepts of the solavtion models are right. You must take into
account the van der Waals (vdW) energies, which to first order can be
considered as a kind of vdWs surface energy.
More or less accidentally, for water vdWs energy and surface tension
(cavity formation free energy) almost cancel, so that hydration free
energies of alkanes are very slightly positive. Since aromatics (due to
the quadrupole moment) are slightly more polar than alkanes, hydration
free energies of aromatics are slightly negative, as you say.
In a less polar solvent than water the cavitation free energy is much
less positive (typically close to zero). Thus the solavtion free energy
in such solvent would be much more negative that it is into water, and
thus the ballance of the transfer of aromatics from water to less
polar
solvents is much in favor of the non-polar solvent.
You can study these terms in detail in our solvation model COSMO-RS
(see
www.cosmologic.de).
Regards
Andreas
Chemical, , Bond wrote:
Hi there,
I am confused with a single concept: what should be the sign for the
solvation free energy for a fragment like phenyl?
There are many experimental data of solvation free energy for aromatic
hydrocarbons, such as benzene, naphthalene, etc, but they are all negative
surprisingly. I looked at several papers with models of solvation energy, and
their predictions all all have negative solvation energies for those compounds,
just like the experiments.
Typically when a phenyl group is transfered from water into protein,
we would like to say there is a negative(beneficial) desolvation energy, or the
usual called hydrophobic effect. And this has been used in tons of models for
protein simulation or protein-ligand binding. Note, in this context, the
solvation energy (from gas into water) is positive!
Is there something wrong over here? Or just some artifact from the fitting?
Hope there would be some good comments.
Thanks a lot,
Bond
-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
and send your message to: CHEMISTRY _()_ ccl.net
Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST
_()_ ccl.net
HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
If your is mail bouncing from ccl.net domain due to spam filters, please
use the Web based form from CCL Home Page
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. habil. Andreas Klamt
COSMOlogic GmbH&CoKG
Burscheider Str. 515
51381 Leverkusen, Germany
Tel.: +49-2171-73168-1
Fax: +49-2171-73168-9
e-mail: klamt _()_ cosmologic.de
web: www.cosmologic.de
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COSMOlogic
Your Competent Partner for
Computational Chemistry and Fluid Thermodynamics
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------