From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Mon Feb 27 19:32:01 2006 From: "Osman Guner oguner*|*turquoisecons.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: software pattents in chemistry? Message-Id: <-31024-060227151802-24332-6R59eHo5yTuc1cnzptpaTg##server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Osman Guner" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01C63B8F.75C848A0" Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:17:55 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Osman Guner" [oguner*_*turquoisecons.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C63B8F.75C848A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patenting pharmacophore models have been an issue for some time. There = are a number of patents that are still pending, but there are also some that = are issued. Those patents that are issued are not just the pharmacophore = model itself, but the model in conjunction with other inventions. =20 There is a nice, but somewhat dated discussion on this at: =20 Pieraccioli D. "Patenting the pharmacophore", Curr. Drug. Disc. 2002, October, pp 40-43 =20 Also some mention on this in my monologue, where I list some of the = patents that are pending, and some that are issued: =20 G=FCner, O.F. "The impact of pharmacophore modeling in drug design," = IDrugs, 2005 8(7), 567-572. =20 =20 Osman F, G=FCner, PhD Principal, Turquoise Consulting oguner-$-turquoisecons.com http://www.turquoisecons.com =20 -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry-$-ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry-$-ccl.net]=20 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:12 AM To: Guner, Osman F Subject: CCL: software pattents in chemistry? =20 Sent to CCL by: Egon Willighagen [e.willighagen]_[science.ru.nl] =20 Hi all, =20 Today I learned that software pattents have hit chemistry, = chemoinformatics in=20 this case: =20 http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=3DEPODOC&IDX=3DWO2005001743&F=3D0 =20 I have no idea on the impact of this pattent, but was wondering if = others saw=20 more software pattents in chemistry, and wether software pattents in=20 chemistry affected work in our field.=20 =20 Anyone who has experience with software pattents in cheminformatics,=20 computational chemistry and the likes? =20 Egon =20 --=20 e.willighagen++science.ru.nl PhD student on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Radboud University Nijmegen Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 =20 =20 =20 -=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script = =3D-=20http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message =20=20 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:=20=20=20 Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs=20=20 Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig (login: ccl, Password: = search) =20http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt =20=20=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C63B8F.75C848A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Patenting pharmacophore models have been an issue for some = time.=A0 There are a number of patents that are still pending, but there are also some = that are issued.=A0 Those patents that are issued are not just the = pharmacophore model itself, but the model in conjunction with other = inventions.

 

There is a nice, but somewhat dated discussion on this = at:

 

Pieraccioli D.=A0 "Patenting the pharmacophore", = Curr. Drug. Disc. 2002, October, pp = 40-43

 

Also some mention on this in my monologue, where I list some of = the patents that are pending, and some that are = issued:

 

G=FCner, O.F.=A0 "The impact of pharmacophore modeling in = drug design," IDrugs, 2005 8(7), 567-572.

 

 

Osman F, G=FCner, PhD

Principal, Turquoise Consulting

oguner-$-turquoisecons.com

http://www.turquoisecons.com

 

-----Original Message-----
> From: owner-chemistry-$-ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry-$-ccl.net]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:12 AM
To: Guner, Osman F
Subject: CCL: software pattents in chemistry?

 

Sent to CCL by: Egon Willighagen = [e.willighagen]_[science.ru.nl]

 

Hi all,

 

Today I learned that software pattents have hit chemistry, chemoinformatics in

this case:

 

http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=3DEPODOC&IDX=3DWO200500174= 3&F=3D0

 

I have no idea on the impact of this pattent, but was wondering = if others saw

more software pattents in chemistry, and wether software = pattents in

chemistry affected work in our field. =

 

Anyone who has experience with software pattents in = cheminformatics,

computational chemistry and the = likes?

 

Egon

 

--

e.willighagen++science.ru.nl

PhD student on Molecular Representation in = Chemometrics

Radboud = University Nijmegen

Blog: = http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/

http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/egonw/

GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6

 

 

 

-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing = script =3D-

To recover the email address of the author of the message, = please change

the strange characters on the top line to the -$- sign. You can = also

look up the X-Original-From: line in the mail = header.

 

E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY-$-ccl.net or = use:

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =<= /p>

 

E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST-$-ccl.net or = use

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =<= /p>

 

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =

=

 

Before posting, check wait time at: = http://www.ccl.net

 

Conferences: = http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/

 

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig=A0 (login: ccl, = Password: search)

 

If your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, = check:

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =

 

RTFI: = http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/

 

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-= +-+-+-+

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C63B8F.75C848A0--