CCL:G: Gaussian .chk files



Dear Dave,
I don't know if I get you very well.
About the command geom=checkpoint, when this is states, gaussian find the geometry in the checkpoint file independently of whether it would have been specified or not in the input file.
Elsewhere, I do not understand what you are doing to overcome your problem. In fact, I would like to precise to you that when using the key word geom=checkpoint, it is better to add the command guess=read so that gaussian will read guess orbitals in the checkpoint file. If this key word is missing, the program would build default guess orbitals which are obviuosly different from the previous ones. Therefore, it is normal to obtain different results with and without the key word guess=read specified. Finally, I want to mean that, you have to add the key word guess=read which is appropriate to your job.

Hope this would help.


Jean Jules FIFEN
University of Douala,
Faculty of Science
Laboratoire de Physique Fondamentale.


On 20 February 2011 22:19, David M. Close closeda/etsu.edu <owner-chemistry+/-ccl.net> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "David M. Close" [closed++etsu.edu]
 Last month I wrote a question to CCL about a problem with Gaussian .chk files.  I got a few replies about which keywords to use, but this I already knew.  I should have been more specific.  I was trying to do a frequency calculation on a previous SCRF calculation using G98.  Apparently this cannot be done.  The calulation begin by reading the .chk file, but then fails to open the information needed for the frequency calculation.
 I gave up on this and switched to G03.  This program does the same SCRF calculation as G98 and gives the same answers.  But there are still problems with the frequency calculation if I do the following.
 1) Run a geometry optimization.
 2) Run a single point SCRF calculation using geom=checkpoint on the      geometry optimized xyz coordinates from part (1).
 3) Do a frequency calculation on the SCRF job again using geom=checkpoint.

 Step three does the frequency calculation on the geometry from step (1), which may be expected since I didn't reoptimize the structure in the SCRF step.  However I get a completely different answer if I elimate step (3) and  run step (2) with the combined SCRF and freq keywords in a single step.
This procedure produces numbers that are not in agreement with calculations in the literature.
 Of course I may be doing something wrong here.  For example I have no idea how the command geom=checkpoint is used.  Does anyone know if you use a .chk file to do several calculations, which part is read by default if you try to read it again?

 Regards, Dave Close.



-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY+/-ccl.net or use:
     http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST+/-ccl.net or use
     http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
     http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
     http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/





--
Jules.