CCL: Suitable Basis set for Hg(II) Calculation
- From: "Theodore S. Dibble"
<tsdibble,+,esf.edu>
- Subject: CCL: Suitable Basis set for Hg(II) Calculation
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:11:51 -0500
Sent to CCL by: "Theodore S. Dibble" [tsdibble##esf.edu]
Pezhman,
In general, one expects the LANL2DZ basis set is far surpassed by the
Stuttgart basis sets, available at http://www.theochem.uni-stuttgart.de/pseudopotentials/index.en.html.
This site provides ECPs and matching correlation-consistent basis sets for the
outer electrons.
It is certainly possible that LANL2DZ actually performs better than more
recent basis sets for certain classes of problems. Are there experimental data
sets you can use to validate your methods?
Best wishes,
Ted Dibble
Theodore S. Dibble
Professor of Chemistry
SUNY-Environmental Science and Forestry
1 Forestry Drive
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 470-6596
(315) 470-6856 (fax)
http://www.esf.edu/chemistry/faculty/dibble.htm
> "Pezhman Zarabadi-Poor pzarabadip]~[gmail.com" wrote:
>
> Sent to CCL by: "Pezhman Zarabadi-Poor" [pzarabadip/a\gmail.com]
> Dear CCL users,
>
> I am planning to do some DFT and TDDFT calculations on a complex of Hg(II)
and
> a naphthalene sulfonic acid derivative. I searched through the literature
and
> found that some of previous computational works have employed ECP-LANL2DZ
for
> Hg(II). Is it a good suggestion for doing such calculations? I checked the
> larger basis sets such as aug-cc-pVDZ to QZ but I obtained a little bit
> different results than the published ones? According to the consultant with
an
> expert person, there is guess that maybe employing larger basis sets makes
Hg
> ions too soft and makes the results wrong!
>
> Your suggestions about the appropriate method/basis sets are highly
> appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Pezhman Zarabadi-Poor
>
>