From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Jul 18 11:26:00 2012 From: "Hao-Bo Guo guohaobo++gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Latest issue of Foundations of Chemistry Message-Id: <-47224-120718094341-19400-IT5yU+aQlyxYptlx98PlNA|-|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Hao-Bo Guo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3079bdda3b5fe304c51ad989 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:43:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Hao-Bo Guo [guohaobo() gmail.com] --20cf3079bdda3b5fe304c51ad989 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear Ulf Ekstrom, I read Dr. Eric Scerri's posts and his blog from CCL and do feel some of them are interesting. I agree with you that CCL subscribers are mostly computational chemists or physicists, but that doesn't mean that we do not need to have a deeper thought of the fundamental chemistry and physics. Besides, everyone is going to enjoy his/her publications being cited or being interested, and therefore you should not criticize the willingness of any authors, including bloggers, for getting more readers. Regards, Hao-Bo Guo, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:46 AM, uekstrom ~~ gmail.com uekstrom ~~ gmail.com wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "uekstrom]_[gmail.com" [uekstrom]_[gmail.com] > Dear Tom, > I did not mean that no subscriber to CCL is interested in Frontiers of > Chemistry. What I meant was that Eric Scerri could use one or two > sentences in his posts to write _why_ CCL subscribers should check out > his blog posts or journal issues. You may note that he has not replied > (on CCL at least) to any of the people discussing his blog posts. On > is tempted to think that he just posts them here to get more readers, > and is not really interested in discussion about computational > chemistry. > > Regards, > Ulf Ekstrom, University of Oslo> > > --20cf3079bdda3b5fe304c51ad989 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Ulf Ekstrom,
I read Dr. Eric Scerri's posts and his blog from C= CL and do feel some of them are interesting.
I agree with you that CCL s= ubscribers are mostly computational chemists or physicists, but that doesn&= #39;t mean that we do not need to have a deeper thought of the fundamental = chemistry and physics. Besides, everyone is going to enjoy his/her publicat= ions being cited or being interested, and therefore you should not criticiz= e the willingness of any authors, including bloggers, for getting more read= ers.
Regards,
Hao-Bo Guo, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:46 AM, uekstrom ~~ gmail.com uekstrom ~~ gmail.c= om <owner-chemistry*|*ccl.net> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "uekstrom]_[gmail.com" [uekstrom]_[gmail.com]
Dear Tom,
I did not mean that no subscriber to CCL is interested in Frontiers of
Chemistry. What I meant was that Eric Scerri could use one or two
sentences in his posts to write _why_ CCL subscribers should check out
his blog posts or journal issues. You may note that he has not replied
(on CCL at least) to any of the people discussing his blog posts. On
is tempted to think that he just posts them here to get more readers,
and is not really interested in discussion about computational
chemistry.

Regards,
Ulf Ekstrom, University of Oslo



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY*|*ccl.n= et or use:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST*|*ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=A0 =A0 =A0 h= ttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



--20cf3079bdda3b5fe304c51ad989--