CCL: ChemPhysChem: warning
- From: "Demetra Dimetrodon"
<dpfiz---hotmail.com>
- Subject: CCL: ChemPhysChem: warning
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 03:19:04 -0400
Sent to CCL by: "Demetra Dimetrodon" [dpfiz * hotmail.com]
Dear Dr. Ismail,
What you say makes sense, but normally the decision about unsuitability takes at
most a week or two. It is completely improbable for ALL reviewers (even say,
three) contacted to all refuse. If so, I should have been informed that this
most improbable scenario (all referees refusing to review) has in fact taken
place. The fact that I wasn't contacted at any time during these two months, and
was left to believe that my paper was being reviewed, means that my rights were
trampled on. I'm willing to wager that this hasn't happened to anybody else.
Moreover, the journal I subsequently sent my paper to seemed to have no issues
with reviewers refusing to review. Could it be because this time, I explicitly
requested for my former boss to not be a referee, due to conflict of interest?
Dr. Ma, I beg to differ. The fact that the editor is not an active researcher
makes the potential for her manipulation much greater than if she had a
reputation to uphold in the scientific community.
DD