CCL: real-valued versus complex-valued molecular orbitals



Dear colleagues,

In my research, I've encountered a question about real-valued versus complex-valued molecular orbitals. Normally, most software programs that perform DFT, Hartree-Fock, coupled cluster, or configuration interaction type quantum chemistry computations on molecules use real-valued molecular orbitals. 

My first question is whether there exists any theorem that shows this will converge to the ground state (i.e., that using complex valued orbitals would not reach a lower energy state) when the Hamiltonian does not contain any spin-orbit coupling or applied magnetic field? In other words, when the multi-electronic Hamiltonian is comprised of the normal terms: electron kinetic energy, nuclear-electron potential energy, nuclear-nuclear potential energy, electron-electron Coulomb & exchange-correlation energies.

My second question is regarding periodic DFT calculations for which many software programs use complex-valued molecular orbitals. Are their any kinds of chemical bonds that exist for complex-valued molecular orbitals that do not exist for real-valued molecular orbitals? Are their any new bonding symmetries made possible for the complex-valued orbitals that cannot exist for the real-valued orbitals? For real-valued molecular orbitals, the primary covalent bond-orbital symmetries are sigma, pi, delta, and phi. Do complex-valued orbitals enable any additional bond-orbital symmetries?

I sincerely appreciate any insights into this topic you can provide.

Tom